PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USNQX vs. DMCRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USNQX vs. DMCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USNQX achieves a 21.19% return, which is significantly lower than DMCRX's 23.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with USNQX having a 21.64% annualized return and DMCRX not far ahead at 22.33%.


USNQX

1D
-0.29%
1M
9.17%
YTD
21.19%
6M
19.57%
1Y
41.10%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
17.67%
10Y*
21.64%

DMCRX

1D
-1.59%
1M
1.28%
YTD
23.52%
6M
24.75%
1Y
76.43%
3Y*
29.83%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
22.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USNQX vs. DMCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USNQX
USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
21.19%20.52%25.42%54.46%-32.71%26.82%48.31%38.86%-0.43%32.30%
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
23.52%31.17%30.58%11.47%-33.54%22.23%86.43%34.03%2.52%24.35%

Correlation

The correlation between USNQX and DMCRX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2013

0.72

The correlation between USNQX and DMCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USNQX vs. DMCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USNQX
USNQX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
USNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
USNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
USNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
USNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DMCRX
DMCRX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DMCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DMCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USNQX vs. DMCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USNQXDMCRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

5.02

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.21

17.80

-4.59

USNQX vs. DMCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USNQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the DMCRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USNQX and DMCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USNQXDMCRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.73

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.27

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

0.66

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.59

-0.22

Drawdowns

USNQX vs. DMCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNQX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, which is greater than DMCRX's maximum drawdown of -59.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNQX and DMCRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USNQXDMCRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.24%

-59.16%

-17.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.07%

-15.46%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.88%

-34.92%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.95%

-59.16%

+22.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.95%

-59.16%

+22.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-2.70%

+2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.75%

-20.10%

-6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

4.35%

-1.20%

Volatility

USNQX vs. DMCRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) is 4.53%, while Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that USNQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USNQXDMCRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

8.50%

-3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.19%

21.12%

-8.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

28.50%

-12.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

39.48%

-16.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.66%

33.98%

-11.32%

USNQX vs. DMCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USNQX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than DMCRX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

USNQX vs. DMCRX - Dividend Comparison

USNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than DMCRX's 11.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
11.11%13.72%3.86%0.87%8.20%48.23%19.79%14.70%33.22%8.91%0.00%4.20%
USNQX
USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
2.49%3.01%2.19%2.60%4.13%4.48%1.53%0.88%0.69%1.97%0.50%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


USNQX and DMCRX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMCRX has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to USNQX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USNQX dropped -76.24% vs DMCRX's -59.16%.

DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USNQX and DMCRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer