USMF vs. CTEF
USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. USMF is passively managed, while CTEF is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USMF charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
USMF vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMF achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.35% return.
USMF
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- 1Y
- 6.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
CTEF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 29.35%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USMF vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 4.36% | 3.15% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 29.35% | 33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMF and CTEF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMF vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
USMF
CTEF
USMF vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMF | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMF | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 3.54 | -2.92 |
Drawdowns
USMF vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMF and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMF | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.24% | -15.00% | -21.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -0.41% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -1.80% | -2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | — | — |
Volatility
USMF vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMF | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.79% | 21.81% | -11.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 21.81% | -7.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 21.81% | -4.84% |
USMF vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMF has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMF vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.32% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMF and CTEF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.
USMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for USMF and 0.45% for CTEF.
Find the right allocation for USMF and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer