USMF vs. BMVP
USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) and BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - USMF tracks the WisdomTree US Multifactor Index while BMVP tracks the Bloomberg MVP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMF returned 7.67%/yr vs 6.10%/yr for BMVP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USMF charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BMVP.
Performance
USMF vs. BMVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMF achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than BMVP's 5.85% return.
USMF
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- 1Y
- 6.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
BMVP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
USMF vs. BMVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 4.36% | 4.60% | 19.65% | 13.47% | -8.82% | 21.26% | 12.01% | 24.06% | -4.72% | 11.27% |
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 5.85% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | -16.01% | 19.38% | 8.52% | 13.47% | -6.40% | 11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMF and BMVP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between USMF and BMVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USMF vs. BMVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMF
BMVP
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
USMF
BMVP
Financial Services
USMF
BMVP
Consumer Cyclical
USMF
BMVP
Communication Services
USMF
BMVP
Healthcare
USMF
BMVP
Industrials
USMF
BMVP
Consumer Defensive
USMF
BMVP
Energy
USMF
BMVP
Real Estate
USMF
BMVP
Utilities
USMF
BMVP
Basic Materials
USMF
BMVP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMF vs. BMVP — Risk / Return Rank
USMF
BMVP
USMF vs. BMVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMF | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.15 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.32 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | 4.06 | -1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMF | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 0.88 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.38 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.11 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
USMF vs. BMVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum BMVP drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMF and BMVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMF | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.24% | -78.13% | +41.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -6.45% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -15.12% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.10% | -26.58% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -2.37% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -36.21% | +32.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.10% | +0.05% |
Volatility
USMF vs. BMVP - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) at 2.14%. This indicates that USMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMF | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 2.14% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.43% | 7.19% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.79% | 9.75% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 16.07% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 18.81% | -1.84% |
USMF vs. BMVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMF has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than BMVP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMF vs. BMVP - Dividend Comparison
USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than BMVP's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.32% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMF and BMVP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USMF has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to BMVP (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMF dropped -36.24% vs BMVP's -78.13%.
On 5-year performance, USMF leads with 7.67% vs 6.10% for BMVP. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USMF has performed better with a 7.67% return vs 6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BMVP.
BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.32% for USMF.
USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index, while BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for USMF and 0.29% for BMVP.
BMVP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMF and BMVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer