USMD vs. CHPS
USMD (CoreValues America First Technology ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMD is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by CoreValues, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. USMD is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USMD charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
USMD vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
USMD
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -12.04%
- 6M
- 70.12%
- YTD
- 88.58%
- 1Y
- 149.46%
- 3Y*
- 53.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USMD vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
USMD CoreValues America First Technology ETF | 21.52% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 66.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMD and CHPS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMD vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
USMD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHPS
USMD vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreValues America First Technology ETF (USMD) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USMD | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 26.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USMD vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMD drawdown since its inception was -10.35%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMD and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMD | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.35% | -39.44% | +29.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.83% | -17.18% | +8.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -9.14% | +6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.68% | — |
Volatility
USMD vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMD | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.33% | 42.87% | -16.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.33% | 36.44% | -10.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.33% | 36.44% | -10.11% |
USMD vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMD has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMD vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
USMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.34% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
USMD CoreValues America First Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMD and CHPS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for USMD.
CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for USMD.
USMD is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: CoreValues and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for USMD and 0.15% for CHPS.
Find the right allocation for USMD and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer