PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USLV.L vs. XDPP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USLV.L vs. XDPP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USLV.L achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than XDPP.L's 10.57% return.


USLV.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
1.11%
6M
0.76%
1Y
1.27%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
8.39%

XDPP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.50%
YTD
10.57%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USLV.L vs. XDPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
USLV.L
SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF
1.11%-2.67%15.49%-6.05%9.44%
XDPP.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C
10.57%9.44%27.26%19.81%2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between USLV.L and XDPP.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between USLV.L and XDPP.L has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USLV.L vs. XDPP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USLV.L
USLV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
USLV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USLV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
USLV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
USLV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
USLV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XDPP.L
XDPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XDPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XDPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USLV.L vs. XDPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USLV.LXDPP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.52

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

3.99

-3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.40

14.32

-13.92

USLV.L vs. XDPP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USLV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the XDPP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USLV.L and XDPP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USLV.LXDPP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

2.78

-2.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.25

-0.48

Drawdowns

USLV.L vs. XDPP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USLV.L drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, which is greater than XDPP.L's maximum drawdown of -20.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLV.L and XDPP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USLV.LXDPP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.37%

-20.98%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.96%

-7.28%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.71%

-20.98%

+10.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

-0.24%

-6.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-3.49%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.03%

+1.10%

Volatility

USLV.L vs. XDPP.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that USLV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USLV.LXDPP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

2.62%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

7.13%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

10.46%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

13.89%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.00%

13.89%

+0.11%

USLV.L vs. XDPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USLV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDPP.L's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

USLV.L vs. XDPP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither USLV.L nor XDPP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


USLV.L and XDPP.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDPP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDPP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USLV.L.

USLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while XDPP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USLV.L and 0.06% for XDPP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USLV.L and XDPP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer