PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USLV.L vs. SPEP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USLV.L vs. SPEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USLV.L is traded in GBP, while SPEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPEP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USLV.L achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than SPEP.L's 10.66% return.


USLV.L

1D
0.23%
1M
3.73%
YTD
7.43%
6M
8.47%
1Y
9.64%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
8.09%

SPEP.L

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.51%
YTD
10.66%
6M
11.05%
1Y
30.32%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USLV.L vs. SPEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
USLV.L
SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF
7.43%-2.67%15.48%-6.04%6.92%26.04%0.25%
SPEP.L
Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc
10.66%9.94%26.61%21.47%-8.35%34.02%21.63%

Correlation

The correlation between USLV.L and SPEP.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2020

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between USLV.L and SPEP.L has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

USLV.L vs. SPEP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USLV.L
SPEP.L

Utilities

25.3%
1.4%

Financial Services

21.3%
12.3%

Real Estate

18.0%
2.2%

Industrials

11.4%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

9.6%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
5.0%

Healthcare

4.0%
10.6%

Energy

2.7%
2.7%

Technology

1.9%
38.0%

Basic Materials

1.0%
2.0%

Communication Services

0.9%
12.6%

Utilities

USLV.L
25.3%
SPEP.L
1.4%

Financial Services

USLV.L
21.3%
SPEP.L
12.3%

Real Estate

USLV.L
18.0%
SPEP.L
2.2%

Industrials

USLV.L
11.4%
SPEP.L
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

USLV.L
9.6%
SPEP.L
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

USLV.L
4.0%
SPEP.L
5.0%

Healthcare

USLV.L
4.0%
SPEP.L
10.6%

Energy

USLV.L
2.7%
SPEP.L
2.7%

Technology

USLV.L
1.9%
SPEP.L
38.0%

Basic Materials

USLV.L
1.0%
SPEP.L
2.0%

Communication Services

USLV.L
0.9%
SPEP.L
12.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USLV.L vs. SPEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USLV.L
USLV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
USLV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USLV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USLV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
USLV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
USLV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEP.L
SPEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USLV.L vs. SPEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USLV.LSPEP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.51

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

4.35

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

16.79

-13.83

USLV.L vs. SPEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USLV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USLV.L and SPEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USLV.L vs. SPEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USLV.L drawdown since its inception was -40.77%, which is greater than SPEP.L's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLV.L and SPEP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USLV.LSPEP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.77%

-21.07%

-19.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-6.93%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-21.07%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.65%

-21.07%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-0.95%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-4.48%

-5.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

1.80%

+1.45%

Volatility

USLV.L vs. SPEP.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) at 3.56%. This indicates that USLV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USLV.LSPEP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

3.56%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

7.60%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

10.91%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.68%

20.10%

-1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

20.79%

-3.88%

USLV.L vs. SPEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USLV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEP.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

USLV.L vs. SPEP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither USLV.L nor SPEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


USLV.L and SPEP.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPEP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPEP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USLV.L.

USLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while SPEP.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USLV.L and 0.09% for SPEP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USLV.L and SPEP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer