USLV.L vs. IUES.L
USLV.L (SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF) and IUES.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - USLV.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while IUES.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USLV.L returned 8.39%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for IUES.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USLV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUES.L.
Performance
USLV.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
USLV.L is traded in GBP, while IUES.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUES.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USLV.L achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 31.41% return. Over the past 10 years, USLV.L has underperformed IUES.L with an annualized return of 8.39%, while IUES.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.07% annualized return.
USLV.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.27%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 8.39%
IUES.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 6M
- 28.75%
- 1Y
- 48.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 21.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
USLV.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USLV.L SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF | 1.11% | -2.67% | 15.49% | -6.05% | 6.92% | 26.04% | -5.76% | 22.99% | 4.45% | 6.15% |
IUES.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.98% | 1.99% | 5.69% | -5.60% | 83.32% | 53.38% | -35.31% | 4.67% | -13.27% | -9.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between USLV.L and IUES.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015 | 0.33 |
USLV.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USLV.L
IUES.L
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Utilities
USLV.L
IUES.L
-
Financial Services
USLV.L
IUES.L
-
Real Estate
USLV.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Defensive
USLV.L
IUES.L
-
Industrials
USLV.L
IUES.L
-
Healthcare
USLV.L
IUES.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
USLV.L
IUES.L
-
Technology
USLV.L
IUES.L
-
Basic Materials
USLV.L
IUES.L
-
Energy
USLV.L
IUES.L
Communication Services
USLV.L
IUES.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USLV.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank
USLV.L
IUES.L
USLV.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USLV.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.36 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 2.89 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | 8.95 | -8.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USLV.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 2.08 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.81 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.36 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.36 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
USLV.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USLV.L drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLV.L and IUES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USLV.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.37% | -62.40% | +35.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.96% | -16.59% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.71% | -23.92% | +13.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.56% | -23.92% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -62.40% | +35.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.23% | -8.77% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -16.00% | +10.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 5.37% | -2.24% |
Volatility
USLV.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) is 3.76%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that USLV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USLV.L | IUES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 8.73% | -4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 19.54% | -11.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 23.12% | -12.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.11% | 26.63% | -14.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 28.23% | -14.23% |
USLV.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USLV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IUES.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
USLV.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither USLV.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
USLV.L and IUES.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUES.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUES.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USLV.L.
USLV.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. USLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USLV.L and 0.15% for IUES.L.
Find the right allocation for USLV.L and IUES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer