PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USISX vs. YAFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USISX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Income Stock Fund (USISX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USISX achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 25.82% return. Over the past 10 years, USISX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 11.44%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


USISX

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.28%
6M
12.99%
YTD
19.26%
1Y
31.01%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
11.44%
ALL TIME*
8.98%

YAFFX

1D
1.17%
1M
4.09%
6M
15.10%
YTD
25.82%
1Y
43.31%
3Y*
18.05%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
13.12%
ALL TIME*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

USISX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USISX
USAA Income Stock Fund
19.26%13.44%13.52%12.10%-4.42%26.52%0.32%23.67%-5.51%16.66%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
25.82%23.70%0.63%16.53%-8.20%16.48%17.22%19.21%2.99%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between USISX and YAFFX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 1997

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between USISX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USISX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USISX
USISX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
USISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
USISX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
USISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
USISX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

YAFFX
YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USISX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Income Stock Fund (USISX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USISXYAFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.48

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.47

4.74

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.14

11.78

+9.36

USISX vs. YAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the YAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USISX and YAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USISX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USISX drawdown since its inception was -58.46%, which is greater than YAFFX's maximum drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USISX and YAFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USISXYAFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.46%

-43.80%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-8.76%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-15.63%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-21.31%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.00%

-30.62%

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-4.24%

+2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-6.09%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

3.52%

-2.10%

Volatility

USISX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Income Stock Fund (USISX) is 2.74%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that USISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USISXYAFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

4.17%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

14.27%

-6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

16.23%

-5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

13.93%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

14.34%

+3.67%

USISX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USISX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

USISX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison

USISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, less than YAFFX's 14.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USISX
USAA Income Stock Fund
8.49%9.77%18.68%5.85%9.94%10.24%2.06%20.13%9.01%7.92%2.32%6.04%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
14.74%18.55%10.20%4.42%7.60%4.70%11.87%15.84%22.15%11.82%11.81%24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


USISX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YAFFX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to USISX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USISX dropped -58.46% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.

USISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USISX and YAFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer