USHY vs. IWS
USHY (iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index, while IWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USHY returned 4.21%/yr vs 8.67%/yr for IWS. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.
Performance
USHY vs. IWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USHY achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 16.45% return.
USHY
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 6.90%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
IWS
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
USHY vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USHY iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.75% | 8.81% | 8.45% | 12.73% | -11.18% | 5.02% | 6.17% | 14.24% | -2.41% | 0.16% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 16.45% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between USHY and IWS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between USHY and IWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
USHY vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USHY
IWS
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
USHY
IWS
Real Estate
USHY
IWS
Basic Materials
USHY
-
IWS
Communication Services
USHY
-
IWS
Consumer Cyclical
USHY
-
IWS
Consumer Defensive
USHY
-
IWS
Financial Services
USHY
-
IWS
Healthcare
USHY
-
IWS
Industrials
USHY
-
IWS
Technology
USHY
-
IWS
Utilities
USHY
-
IWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USHY vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank
USHY
IWS
USHY vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USHY | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.68 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.77 | 13.82 | -1.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USHY vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USHY drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USHY and IWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USHY | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -62.40% | +39.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.43% | -7.53% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.66% | -20.57% | +15.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.56% | -21.23% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -8.01% | +5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 2.00% | -1.46% |
Volatility
USHY vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) is 1.20%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that USHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USHY | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 4.29% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | 9.97% | -7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.69% | 13.53% | -9.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.35% | 17.36% | -10.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.24% | 19.37% | -11.13% |
USHY vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
USHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USHY vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison
USHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than IWS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.32% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
USHY iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.90% | 6.79% | 6.89% | 6.63% | 6.08% | 5.07% | 5.30% | 5.92% | 6.30% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USHY and IWS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWS has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to USHY (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USHY dropped -22.44% vs IWS's -62.40%.
On 5-year performance, IWS leads with 8.67% vs 4.21% for USHY. On fees, USHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IWS has performed better with a 8.67% return vs 4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.
USHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.90%, compared with 1.32% for IWS.
USHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IWS is Mid Cap Value Equities. USHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USHY and 0.23% for IWS.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USHY and IWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer