USGNX vs. FUTBX
USGNX (USAA Government Securities Fund) and FUTBX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, USGNX returned 0.80%/yr vs -0.41%/yr for FUTBX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USGNX charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FUTBX.
Performance
USGNX vs. FUTBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USGNX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than FUTBX's 0.07% return.
USGNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 5.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 1.57%
FUTBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.07%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- —
USGNX vs. FUTBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USGNX USAA Government Securities Fund | 0.34% | 7.20% | 1.94% | 4.13% | -8.13% | -1.05% | 5.48% | 5.60% | 1.05% | 1.35% |
FUTBX Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund | 0.07% | 6.12% | 0.70% | 4.19% | -13.00% | -2.54% | 7.76% | 7.30% | 0.95% | 2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between USGNX and FUTBX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between USGNX and FUTBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USGNX vs. FUTBX — Risk / Return Rank
USGNX
FUTBX
USGNX vs. FUTBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Government Securities Fund (USGNX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USGNX | FUTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.18 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.28 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 3.75 | +2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USGNX | FUTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.02 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | -0.07 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.25 | +0.87 |
Drawdowns
USGNX vs. FUTBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USGNX drawdown since its inception was -12.03%, smaller than the maximum FUTBX drawdown of -19.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USGNX and FUTBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USGNX | FUTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.03% | -19.69% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -3.09% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.11% | -5.42% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.03% | -17.03% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -7.62% | +6.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -6.96% | +5.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 1.05% | -0.22% |
Volatility
USGNX vs. FUTBX - Volatility Comparison
USAA Government Securities Fund (USGNX) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) at 1.20%. This indicates that USGNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUTBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USGNX | FUTBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 1.20% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 2.72% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44% | 3.87% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.82% | 5.81% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.80% | 5.15% | -1.35% |
USGNX vs. FUTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USGNX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
USGNX vs. FUTBX - Dividend Comparison
USGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than FUTBX's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUTBX Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.65% | 3.43% | 2.90% | 2.12% | 1.12% | 0.86% | 4.54% | 2.75% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USGNX USAA Government Securities Fund | 3.82% | 3.75% | 3.65% | 2.77% | 2.07% | 3.02% | 2.84% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 2.07% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, USGNX and FUTBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
USGNX has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to FUTBX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USGNX dropped -12.03% vs FUTBX's -19.69%.
USGNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USGNX and FUTBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer