PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USGLX vs. FZAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USGLX vs. FZAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund (USGLX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USGLX achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than FZAPX's 15.87% return. Over the past 10 years, USGLX has underperformed FZAPX with an annualized return of 11.69%, while FZAPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.45% annualized return.


USGLX

1D
-0.99%
1M
2.58%
YTD
-1.51%
6M
-0.18%
1Y
0.75%
3Y*
10.66%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
11.69%

FZAPX

1D
0.33%
1M
5.89%
YTD
15.87%
6M
16.42%
1Y
37.49%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
15.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USGLX vs. FZAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USGLX
John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund
-1.51%2.94%18.17%29.14%-29.76%19.18%35.40%33.07%3.35%25.38%
FZAPX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z
15.87%18.98%19.88%27.05%-19.49%23.25%25.03%32.34%-8.52%24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between USGLX and FZAPX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

0.91

The correlation between USGLX and FZAPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USGLX vs. FZAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USGLX
USGLX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
USGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
USGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
USGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
USGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FZAPX
FZAPX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FZAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USGLX vs. FZAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund (USGLX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USGLXFZAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.54

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

4.18

-4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.16

20.24

-20.08

USGLX vs. FZAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USGLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the FZAPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USGLX and FZAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USGLXFZAPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

2.96

-2.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.75

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.84

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.80

-0.29

Drawdowns

USGLX vs. FZAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USGLX drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, which is greater than FZAPX's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USGLX and FZAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USGLXFZAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.82%

-34.37%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.11%

-9.20%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.58%

-20.84%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.80%

-25.20%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

-34.37%

-2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.32%

0.00%

-12.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-4.56%

-2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

1.89%

+3.63%

Volatility

USGLX vs. FZAPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund (USGLX) is 2.79%, while Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that USGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USGLXFZAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

3.38%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

10.01%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.32%

13.00%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.00%

17.76%

+3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

18.57%

+1.69%

USGLX vs. FZAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USGLX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAPX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

USGLX vs. FZAPX - Dividend Comparison

USGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.82%, more than FZAPX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZAPX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z
4.21%4.88%4.91%2.12%0.39%1.47%5.33%6.18%4.59%3.07%1.13%5.24%
USGLX
John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund
28.82%28.38%15.79%0.00%0.00%8.75%11.38%6.76%13.55%7.34%5.42%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


USGLX and FZAPX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZAPX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to USGLX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USGLX dropped -46.82% vs FZAPX's -34.37%.

FZAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USGLX and FZAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer