PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USGLX vs. FDSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USGLX vs. FDSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund (USGLX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USGLX achieves a -4.06% return, which is significantly lower than FDSSX's 14.50% return. Over the past 10 years, USGLX has underperformed FDSSX with an annualized return of 10.88%, while FDSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.84% annualized return.


USGLX

1D
1.16%
1M
-0.24%
6M
-1.01%
YTD
-4.06%
1Y
-2.62%
3Y*
7.46%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*
10.88%
ALL TIME*
9.67%

FDSSX

1D
1.87%
1M
-0.79%
6M
11.52%
YTD
14.50%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
14.84%
ALL TIME*
11.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

USGLX vs. FDSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USGLX
John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund
-4.06%2.94%18.17%29.14%-29.76%19.18%35.40%33.07%3.35%25.38%
FDSSX
Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund
14.50%18.89%19.79%26.94%-19.55%23.14%24.90%32.21%-8.61%24.42%

Correlation

The correlation between USGLX and FDSSX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 1995

0.88

The correlation between USGLX and FDSSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USGLX vs. FDSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USGLX
USGLX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
USGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
USGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
USGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
USGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FDSSX
FDSSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FDSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USGLX vs. FDSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund (USGLX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USGLXFDSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.33

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

2.83

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

12.79

-13.72

USGLX vs. FDSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USGLX Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the FDSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USGLX and FDSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USGLX vs. FDSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USGLX drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, smaller than the maximum FDSSX drawdown of -56.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USGLX and FDSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USGLXFDSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.82%

-56.77%

+9.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.97%

-9.19%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.58%

-20.86%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.80%

-25.22%

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

-34.37%

-2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.59%

-2.29%

-12.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-9.85%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.94%

2.03%

+3.91%

Volatility

USGLX vs. FDSSX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund (USGLX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USGLXFDSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.73%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.71%

11.38%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

14.26%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.08%

17.90%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.23%

18.58%

+1.65%

USGLX vs. FDSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USGLX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FDSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

USGLX vs. FDSSX - Dividend Comparison

USGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.59%, more than FDSSX's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSSX
Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund
4.18%4.79%4.83%2.03%0.36%0.84%5.22%6.09%4.46%3.07%1.04%5.16%
USGLX
John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund
29.59%28.38%15.79%0.00%0.00%8.75%11.38%6.76%13.55%7.34%5.42%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


USGLX and FDSSX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDSSX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to USGLX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USGLX dropped -46.82% vs FDSSX's -56.77%.

FDSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USGLX and FDSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer