USGG vs. CCUP
USGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long USAR Daily ETF) and CCUP (T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. USGG is passively managed, while CCUP is actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CCUP.
Performance
USGG vs. CCUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
USGG
- 1D
- -16.46%
- 1M
- -50.31%
- 6M
- -54.22%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCUP
- 1D
- -14.78%
- 1M
- -47.07%
- 6M
- -65.95%
- YTD
- -68.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USGG vs. CCUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
USGG Leverage Shares 2X Long USAR Daily ETF | -57.10% |
CCUP T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF | -71.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between USGG and CCUP is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USGG vs. CCUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long USAR Daily ETF (USGG) and T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USGG vs. CCUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USGG drawdown since its inception was -81.13%, smaller than the maximum CCUP drawdown of -94.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USGG and CCUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USGG | CCUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.13% | -94.86% | +13.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.13% | -94.86% | +13.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.09% | -71.70% | +21.61% |
Volatility
USGG vs. CCUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USGG | CCUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 217.96% | 194.57% | +23.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 217.96% | 194.57% | +23.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 217.96% | 194.57% | +23.39% |
USGG vs. CCUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
USGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CCUP's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
USGG vs. CCUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither USGG nor CCUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
USGG and CCUP have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CCUP.
USGG and CCUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for USGG and 1.50% for CCUP.
Find the right allocation for USGG and CCUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer