USFR vs. SPMD
USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) and SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index, while SPMD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, USFR returned 2.42%/yr vs 11.85%/yr for SPMD. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USFR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPMD.
Performance
USFR vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USFR achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than SPMD's 15.96% return. Over the past 10 years, USFR has underperformed SPMD with an annualized return of 2.42%, while SPMD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.85% annualized return.
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
SPMD
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 15.96%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.85%
USFR vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.72% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 15.96% | 7.44% | 13.91% | 16.48% | -13.13% | 24.76% | 13.46% | 25.19% | -10.34% | 15.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between USFR and SPMD is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | 0.01 |
The correlation between USFR and SPMD shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USFR vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank
USFR
SPMD
USFR vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USFR | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +13.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +47.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 13.37 | 1.32 | +12.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 202.37 | 3.23 | +199.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 783.80 | 11.84 | +771.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USFR vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USFR drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum SPMD drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFR and SPMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USFR | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -57.62% | +56.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -8.86% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.06% | -24.08% | +24.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.18% | -24.08% | +23.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.80% | -41.86% | +41.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -8.11% | +7.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 2.41% | -2.40% |
Volatility
USFR vs. SPMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) is 0.08%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that USFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USFR | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 5.07% | -4.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | 11.74% | -11.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27% | 15.86% | -15.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.40% | 19.75% | -19.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.78% | 21.20% | -20.42% |
USFR vs. SPMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
USFR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMD's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USFR vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison
USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than SPMD's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.24% | 1.30% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 5.33% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USFR and SPMD have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMD has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to USFR (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USFR dropped -1.36% vs SPMD's -57.62%.
On 10-year performance, SPMD leads with 11.85% vs 2.42% for USFR. On fees, SPMD is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMD has performed better with a 11.85% return vs 2.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMD is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USFR.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.21% for SPMD.
USFR is categorized as Government Bonds, while SPMD is Mid Cap Blend Equities. USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index, while SPMD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USFR and 0.05% for SPMD.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.85 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USFR and SPMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer