USFM.L vs. VNRG.L
USFM.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and VNRG.L (Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from UBS and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USFM.L returned 11.88%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for VNRG.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USFM.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VNRG.L.
Performance
USFM.L vs. VNRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
USFM.L is traded in GBp, while VNRG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VNRG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USFM.L achieves a 15.71% return, which is significantly higher than VNRG.L's 10.20% return.
USFM.L
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 28.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- —
VNRG.L
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
USFM.L vs. VNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USFM.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 15.71% | 5.73% | 20.11% | 10.47% | -3.22% | 26.12% | 10.79% | 1.33% |
VNRG.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 10.20% | 10.01% | 27.28% | 19.88% | -9.85% | 28.98% | 16.98% | 1.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between USFM.L and VNRG.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between USFM.L and VNRG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USFM.L vs. VNRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USFM.L
VNRG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USFM.L
VNRG.L
Financial Services
USFM.L
VNRG.L
Industrials
USFM.L
VNRG.L
Healthcare
USFM.L
VNRG.L
Consumer Defensive
USFM.L
VNRG.L
Consumer Cyclical
USFM.L
VNRG.L
Communication Services
USFM.L
VNRG.L
Energy
USFM.L
VNRG.L
Utilities
USFM.L
VNRG.L
Real Estate
USFM.L
VNRG.L
Basic Materials
USFM.L
VNRG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USFM.L vs. VNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
USFM.L
VNRG.L
USFM.L vs. VNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USFM.L | VNRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.46 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.16 | 3.75 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.50 | 13.51 | +4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USFM.L vs. VNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USFM.L drawdown since its inception was -27.52%, which is greater than VNRG.L's maximum drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFM.L and VNRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USFM.L | VNRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.52% | -26.12% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.47% | -7.15% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.40% | -20.91% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.40% | -20.91% | +3.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.62% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -3.66% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 1.99% | -0.46% |
Volatility
USFM.L vs. VNRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) is 2.60%, while Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that USFM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USFM.L | VNRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 3.38% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.95% | 7.58% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 10.78% | -1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 14.36% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 16.19% | +0.93% |
USFM.L vs. VNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VNRG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USFM.L vs. VNRG.L - Dividend Comparison
USFM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while VNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USFM.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.14% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.01% | 1.34% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 0.30% |
VNRG.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USFM.L and VNRG.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VNRG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VNRG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for USFM.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for USFM.L and 0.10% for VNRG.L.
Find the right allocation for USFM.L and VNRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer