PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USFM.L vs. USDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USFM.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USFM.L is traded in GBp, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USFM.L achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly higher than USDV.L's 7.22% return.


USFM.L

1D
0.33%
1M
5.20%
YTD
12.16%
6M
12.28%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*

USDV.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.76%
YTD
7.22%
6M
7.16%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
9.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USFM.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USFM.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
12.16%5.73%20.11%10.47%-3.22%26.12%10.79%25.56%-0.38%11.30%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
7.22%1.15%9.34%-3.52%11.58%26.74%-2.72%19.69%1.49%10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between USFM.L and USDV.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2017

0.80

The correlation between USFM.L and USDV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USFM.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USFM.L
USDV.L

Technology

20.8%
8.9%

Industrials

15.3%
17.5%

Financial Services

15.2%
11.5%

Healthcare

13.9%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
17.0%

Communication Services

6.4%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
5.2%

Utilities

4.0%
14.8%

Energy

3.3%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.2%
6.4%

Real Estate

2.9%
4.6%

Technology

USFM.L
20.8%
USDV.L
8.9%

Industrials

USFM.L
15.3%
USDV.L
17.5%

Financial Services

USFM.L
15.2%
USDV.L
11.5%

Healthcare

USFM.L
13.9%
USDV.L
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

USFM.L
8.7%
USDV.L
17.0%

Communication Services

USFM.L
6.4%
USDV.L
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

USFM.L
6.4%
USDV.L
5.2%

Utilities

USFM.L
4.0%
USDV.L
14.8%

Energy

USFM.L
3.3%
USDV.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

USFM.L
3.2%
USDV.L
6.4%

Real Estate

USFM.L
2.9%
USDV.L
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USFM.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USFM.L
USFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
USFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
USFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USFM.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USFM.LUSDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.25

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

2.12

+2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.06

5.42

+10.65

USFM.L vs. USDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the USDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USFM.L and USDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USFM.LUSDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

1.44

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.53

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.84

0.00

Drawdowns

USFM.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USFM.L drawdown since its inception was -27.52%, roughly equal to the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFM.L and USDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USFM.LUSDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.52%

-27.80%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.47%

-6.60%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.40%

-16.30%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.40%

-16.30%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.68%

+3.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-4.14%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

2.58%

-1.04%

Volatility

USFM.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) at 2.53%. This indicates that USFM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USFM.LUSDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.53%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

7.19%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.46%

9.69%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

12.78%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.32%

15.33%

-0.01%

USFM.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

USFM.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison

USFM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than USDV.L's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.20%1.99%2.29%2.11%2.12%2.57%2.65%2.19%3.07%1.65%2.00%
USFM.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.07%1.20%1.14%1.37%1.22%1.01%1.34%1.30%1.37%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USFM.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USFM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USFM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.

USFM.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for USFM.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USFM.L and USDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer