PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USFM.L vs. DGRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USFM.L vs. DGRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USFM.L achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly higher than DGRG.L's 6.87% return.


USFM.L

1D
0.33%
1M
5.20%
YTD
12.16%
6M
12.28%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*

DGRG.L

1D
0.15%
1M
4.47%
YTD
6.87%
6M
6.31%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USFM.L vs. DGRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USFM.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
12.16%5.73%20.11%10.47%-3.22%26.12%10.79%25.56%-0.38%11.30%
DGRG.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
6.87%5.60%20.13%12.11%2.74%26.71%8.76%24.78%-1.18%12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between USFM.L and DGRG.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2017

0.93

The correlation between USFM.L and DGRG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USFM.L vs. DGRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USFM.L
DGRG.L

Technology

20.8%
30.4%

Industrials

15.3%
10.9%

Financial Services

15.2%
10.3%

Healthcare

13.9%
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
8.0%

Communication Services

6.4%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
8.2%

Utilities

4.0%
0.3%

Energy

3.3%
5.2%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.1%

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Technology

USFM.L
20.8%
DGRG.L
30.4%

Industrials

USFM.L
15.3%
DGRG.L
10.9%

Financial Services

USFM.L
15.2%
DGRG.L
10.3%

Healthcare

USFM.L
13.9%
DGRG.L
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

USFM.L
8.7%
DGRG.L
8.0%

Communication Services

USFM.L
6.4%
DGRG.L
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

USFM.L
6.4%
DGRG.L
8.2%

Utilities

USFM.L
4.0%
DGRG.L
0.3%

Energy

USFM.L
3.3%
DGRG.L
5.2%

Basic Materials

USFM.L
3.2%
DGRG.L
3.1%

Real Estate

USFM.L
2.9%
DGRG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USFM.L vs. DGRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USFM.L
USFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
USFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
USFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRG.L
DGRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DGRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USFM.L vs. DGRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USFM.LDGRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.43

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

3.53

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.06

12.98

+3.08

USFM.L vs. DGRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the DGRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USFM.L and DGRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USFM.LDGRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.38

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

1.03

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.01

-0.17

Drawdowns

USFM.L vs. DGRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USFM.L drawdown since its inception was -27.52%, which is greater than DGRG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFM.L and DGRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USFM.LDGRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.52%

-22.57%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.47%

-5.98%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.40%

-17.72%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.40%

-17.72%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-2.96%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.63%

-0.09%

Volatility

USFM.L vs. DGRG.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) at 2.40%. This indicates that USFM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USFM.LDGRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.40%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

6.19%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.46%

8.86%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

12.55%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.32%

14.45%

+0.87%

USFM.L vs. DGRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USFM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRG.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

USFM.L vs. DGRG.L - Dividend Comparison

USFM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while DGRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRG.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USFM.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.07%1.20%1.14%1.37%1.22%1.01%1.34%1.30%1.37%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


USFM.L and DGRG.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USFM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USFM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRG.L.

USFM.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while DGRG.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for USFM.L and 0.33% for DGRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USFM.L and DGRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer