USERX vs. FEMKX
USERX (U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund) and FEMKX (Fidelity Emerging Markets) are both mutual funds - USERX is a Gold fund managed by US Global, while FEMKX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, USERX returned 13.72%/yr vs 12.36%/yr for FEMKX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USERX charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FEMKX.
Performance
USERX vs. FEMKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USERX achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly lower than FEMKX's 27.91% return. Over the past 10 years, USERX has outperformed FEMKX with an annualized return of 13.72%, while FEMKX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.36% annualized return.
USERX
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- -3.46%
- 6M
- -6.89%
- 1Y
- 66.56%
- 3Y*
- 44.70%
- 5Y*
- 18.24%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
FEMKX
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- 7.14%
- YTD
- 27.91%
- 6M
- 29.94%
- 1Y
- 55.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
USERX vs. FEMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USERX U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund | -3.46% | 167.44% | 16.75% | 1.44% | -17.44% | -10.80% | 37.16% | 51.34% | -14.24% | 13.07% |
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets | 27.91% | 31.02% | 7.12% | 15.16% | -27.48% | 1.25% | 32.56% | 33.67% | -18.03% | 46.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between USERX and FEMKX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1990 | 0.28 |
The correlation between USERX and FEMKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USERX vs. FEMKX — Risk / Return Rank
USERX
FEMKX
USERX vs. FEMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USERX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USERX | FEMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.47 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 4.19 | -2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.52 | 14.95 | -10.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USERX vs. FEMKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USERX drawdown since its inception was -97.74%, which is greater than FEMKX's maximum drawdown of -71.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USERX and FEMKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USERX | FEMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.74% | -71.14% | -26.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.89% | -13.00% | -23.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.89% | -19.13% | -17.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.91% | -40.88% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.45% | -43.24% | -0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.21% | -0.23% | -46.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.01% | -25.92% | -49.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.05% | 3.64% | +10.41% |
Volatility
USERX vs. FEMKX - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USERX) has a higher volatility of 17.10% compared to Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) at 11.90%. This indicates that USERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEMKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USERX | FEMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.10% | 11.90% | +5.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.31% | 19.29% | +20.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.47% | 21.60% | +24.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.74% | 19.48% | +14.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.20% | 18.96% | +15.24% |
USERX vs. FEMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USERX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMKX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
USERX vs. FEMKX - Dividend Comparison
USERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, more than FEMKX's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 0.77% | 6.00% | 1.39% | 1.71% | 0.83% | 0.08% | 0.67% | 0.51% |
USERX U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund | 6.01% | 2.95% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 2.68% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USERX and FEMKX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USERX has higher volatility (17.10%) compared to FEMKX (11.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USERX dropped -97.74% vs FEMKX's -71.14%.
FEMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USERX and FEMKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer