USERX vs. FEMKX

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

USERX (U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund) and FEMKX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund) are both mutual funds - USERX is a Gold fund managed by US Global, while FEMKX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, USERX returned 11.55%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for FEMKX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USERX charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FEMKX.

Performance

USERX vs. FEMKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USERX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FEMKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USERX achieves a -9.03% return, which is significantly lower than FEMKX's 20.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with USERX having a 11.55% annualized return and FEMKX not far behind at 11.41%.

USERX

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: -3.65%
• 6M: -13.51%
• YTD: -9.03%
• 1Y: 53.39%
• 3Y*: 42.59%
• 5Y*: 16.67%
• 10Y*: 11.55%

FEMKX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -1.11%
• 6M: 15.55%
• YTD: 20.97%
• 1Y: 40.76%
• 3Y*: 20.95%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: 11.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USERX vs. FEMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USERX U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund	-9.03%	167.44%	16.75%	1.44%	-17.44%	-10.80%	37.16%	51.34%	-14.24%	13.07%
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund	20.97%	31.02%	7.12%	15.16%	-27.48%	1.25%	32.56%	33.67%	-18.03%	46.92%

Correlation

The correlation between USERX and FEMKX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1990	0.28

The correlation between USERX and FEMKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

USERX vs. FEMKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USERX

USERX Risk / Return Rank: 28
USERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
USERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
USERX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
USERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
USERX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

FEMKX

FEMKX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FEMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FEMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FEMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FEMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FEMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USERX vs. FEMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USERX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FEMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USERX	FEMKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.79	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	2.30	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.34	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	3.13	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.62	10.64	-7.02

USERX vs. FEMKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USERX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the FEMKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USERX and FEMKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USERX vs. FEMKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USERX drawdown since its inception was -97.74%, which is greater than FEMKX's maximum drawdown of -71.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USERX and FEMKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USERX	FEMKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.74%	-71.14%	-26.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.89%	-13.00%	-23.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.89%	-19.13%	-17.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.91%	-40.49%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.45%	-43.24%	-0.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.26%	-6.20%	-44.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.98%	-25.88%	-49.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.91%	3.82%	+12.09%

Volatility

USERX vs. FEMKX - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund (USERX) has a higher volatility of 15.67% compared to Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FEMKX) at 10.87%. This indicates that USERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEMKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USERX	FEMKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.67%	10.87%	+4.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.06%	20.62%	+19.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.22%	22.80%	+24.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.98%	19.75%	+14.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.27%	19.01%	+15.26%

USERX vs. FEMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USERX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMKX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

USERX vs. FEMKX - Dividend Comparison

USERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than FEMKX's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund	0.04%	0.05%	0.65%	1.11%	0.77%	6.00%	1.39%	1.71%	0.83%	0.08%	0.67%	0.51%
USERX U.S. Global Investors Gold & Precious Metals Fund	6.38%	2.95%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%	2.13%	2.68%	0.00%	1.76%	0.00%	0.88%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USERX and FEMKX in my portfolio?

USERX and FEMKX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USERX or FEMKX?

USERX has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to FEMKX (10.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USERX dropped -97.74% vs FEMKX's -71.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.