USDV.L vs. XZMD.L
USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) and XZMD.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - USDV.L tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index while XZMD.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, USDV.L returned 6.93%/yr vs 19.56%/yr for XZMD.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USDV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XZMD.L.
Performance
USDV.L vs. XZMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
USDV.L is traded in GBP, while XZMD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XZMD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USDV.L achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than XZMD.L's 8.47% return.
USDV.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 14.81%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
XZMD.L
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 26.95%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USDV.L vs. XZMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 7.22% | 1.15% | 9.34% | -3.52% | 5.48% |
XZMD.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D | 8.44% | 8.37% | 27.57% | 23.85% | -5.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between USDV.L and XZMD.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2022 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USDV.L and XZMD.L has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USDV.L vs. XZMD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USDV.L
XZMD.L
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
USDV.L
XZMD.L
Consumer Defensive
USDV.L
XZMD.L
Utilities
USDV.L
XZMD.L
Financial Services
USDV.L
XZMD.L
Technology
USDV.L
XZMD.L
Basic Materials
USDV.L
XZMD.L
Healthcare
USDV.L
XZMD.L
Consumer Cyclical
USDV.L
XZMD.L
Real Estate
USDV.L
XZMD.L
Energy
USDV.L
XZMD.L
Communication Services
USDV.L
XZMD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USDV.L vs. XZMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
USDV.L
XZMD.L
USDV.L vs. XZMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USDV.L | XZMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.74 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 8.29 | -6.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 25.82 | -20.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USDV.L | XZMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 4.10 | -2.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 1.39 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
USDV.L vs. XZMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USDV.L drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, which is greater than XZMD.L's maximum drawdown of -22.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USDV.L and XZMD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USDV.L | XZMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.80% | -22.72% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.60% | -10.21% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -22.72% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -0.05% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.14% | -5.03% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 7.53% | -4.95% |
Volatility
USDV.L vs. XZMD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) is 2.53%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.L) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that USDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XZMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USDV.L | XZMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 3.90% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.69% | 20.73% | -11.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 22.32% | -9.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 22.32% | -6.99% |
USDV.L vs. XZMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USDV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XZMD.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
USDV.L vs. XZMD.L - Dividend Comparison
USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than XZMD.L's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 2.04% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.29% | 2.11% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.19% | 3.07% | 1.65% | 2.00% |
XZMD.L Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D | 0.68% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 0.95% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USDV.L and XZMD.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XZMD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XZMD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.
USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while XZMD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USDV.L and 0.15% for XZMD.L.
Find the right allocation for USDV.L and XZMD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer