PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USDV.L vs. LCUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USDV.L vs. LCUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


USDV.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.22%
YTD
7.22%
6M
6.65%
1Y
14.81%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
9.84%

LCUS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USDV.L vs. LCUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
7.22%1.15%9.34%-3.52%11.58%26.74%-2.72%19.69%9.20%
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%3.57%27.38%20.34%-12.04%27.36%14.33%24.68%2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between USDV.L and LCUS.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018

0.66

The correlation between USDV.L and LCUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USDV.L vs. LCUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USDV.L
LCUS.L

Industrials

17.5%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

17.0%
5.3%

Utilities

14.8%
2.4%

Financial Services

11.5%
13.6%

Technology

8.9%
31.9%

Basic Materials

6.4%
1.8%

Healthcare

6.2%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
11.6%

Real Estate

4.6%
2.1%

Energy

4.5%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.5%
10.0%

Industrials

USDV.L
17.5%
LCUS.L
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

USDV.L
17.0%
LCUS.L
5.3%

Utilities

USDV.L
14.8%
LCUS.L
2.4%

Financial Services

USDV.L
11.5%
LCUS.L
13.6%

Technology

USDV.L
8.9%
LCUS.L
31.9%

Basic Materials

USDV.L
6.4%
LCUS.L
1.8%

Healthcare

USDV.L
6.2%
LCUS.L
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

USDV.L
5.2%
LCUS.L
11.6%

Real Estate

USDV.L
4.6%
LCUS.L
2.1%

Energy

USDV.L
4.5%
LCUS.L
3.1%

Communication Services

USDV.L
3.5%
LCUS.L
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USDV.L vs. LCUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USDV.L vs. LCUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USDV.LLCUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

USDV.L vs. LCUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USDV.LLCUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

Drawdowns

USDV.L vs. LCUS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USDV.LLCUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

Volatility

USDV.L vs. LCUS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USDV.LLCUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.33%

USDV.L vs. LCUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USDV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

USDV.L vs. LCUS.L - Dividend Comparison

USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while LCUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.83%0.77%0.69%0.48%0.02%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.20%1.99%2.29%2.11%2.12%2.57%2.65%2.19%3.07%1.65%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USDV.L and LCUS.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.

USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while LCUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USDV.L and 0.04% for LCUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USDV.L and LCUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer