PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USDV.L vs. LCRP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USDV.L vs. LCRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, USDV.L has outperformed LCRP.L with an annualized return of 9.84%, while LCRP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.61% annualized return.


USDV.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.22%
YTD
7.22%
6M
6.65%
1Y
14.81%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
9.84%

LCRP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-1.69%
1Y
6.64%
3Y*
1.41%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
1.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USDV.L vs. LCRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
7.22%1.15%9.34%-3.52%11.58%26.74%-2.72%19.69%1.49%6.73%
LCRP.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%-1.12%0.56%4.59%-16.57%-0.11%10.05%16.19%-5.81%-2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between USDV.L and LCRP.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2015

0.27

The correlation between USDV.L and LCRP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.35 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USDV.L vs. LCRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

LCRP.L
LCRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LCRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USDV.L vs. LCRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USDV.LLCRP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.44

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

2.05

+3.37

USDV.L vs. LCRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the LCRP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USDV.L and LCRP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USDV.LLCRP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.14

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

-0.08

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.12

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.21

+0.63

Drawdowns

USDV.L vs. LCRP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USDV.L drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, roughly equal to the maximum LCRP.L drawdown of -28.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USDV.L and LCRP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USDV.LLCRP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.80%

-28.37%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-4.77%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-11.82%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-26.17%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.80%

-28.37%

+0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-18.73%

+15.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-12.80%

+8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

3.37%

-0.79%

Volatility

USDV.L vs. LCRP.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) at 0.00%. This indicates that USDV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USDV.LLCRP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

0.00%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

2.04%

+5.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

6.08%

+3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.78%

12.04%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.33%

12.86%

+2.47%

USDV.L vs. LCRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USDV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LCRP.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

USDV.L vs. LCRP.L - Dividend Comparison

USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than LCRP.L's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCRP.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.75%5.64%5.14%4.64%4.37%3.29%3.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.20%1.99%2.29%2.11%2.12%2.57%2.65%2.19%3.07%1.65%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USDV.L and LCRP.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCRP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCRP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.

USDV.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while LCRP.L is Corporate Bonds. USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while LCRP.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USDV.L and 0.12% for LCRP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USDV.L and LCRP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer