USDV.L vs. GCVG.L
USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) and GCVG.L (SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USDV.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while GCVG.L is a Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Refinitiv Qualified Global Convertible (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, USDV.L returned 6.93%/yr vs 19.27%/yr for GCVG.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USDV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for GCVG.L.
Performance
USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USDV.L achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than GCVG.L's 18.10% return.
USDV.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 14.81%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
GCVG.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 18.10%
- 6M
- 19.59%
- 1Y
- 36.26%
- 3Y*
- 19.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 7.22% | 1.15% | 9.34% | -3.52% | 13.80% |
GCVG.L SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 18.10% | 22.98% | 9.45% | 13.81% | -14.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between USDV.L and GCVG.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022 | 0.22 |
The correlation between USDV.L and GCVG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USDV.L
GCVG.L
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
USDV.L
GCVG.L
Consumer Defensive
USDV.L
GCVG.L
Utilities
USDV.L
GCVG.L
Financial Services
USDV.L
GCVG.L
Technology
USDV.L
GCVG.L
Basic Materials
USDV.L
GCVG.L
Healthcare
USDV.L
GCVG.L
Consumer Cyclical
USDV.L
GCVG.L
Real Estate
USDV.L
GCVG.L
Energy
USDV.L
GCVG.L
Communication Services
USDV.L
GCVG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USDV.L vs. GCVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
USDV.L
GCVG.L
USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GCVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USDV.L | GCVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.63 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 5.55 | -3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 24.09 | -18.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USDV.L | GCVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 3.19 | -1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 1.07 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USDV.L drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, which is greater than GCVG.L's maximum drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USDV.L and GCVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USDV.L | GCVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.80% | -17.60% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.60% | -6.51% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -7.62% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -0.44% | -3.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.14% | -5.48% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.51% | +1.07% |
Volatility
USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) is 2.53%, while SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GCVG.L) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that USDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USDV.L | GCVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | 3.96% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.19% | 9.31% | -2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.69% | 11.34% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 9.93% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.33% | 9.93% | +5.40% |
USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
USDV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GCVG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Dividend Comparison
USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than GCVG.L's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCVG.L SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 0.52% | 0.59% | 0.41% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 2.04% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.29% | 2.11% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.19% | 3.07% | 1.65% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USDV.L and GCVG.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USDV.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USDV.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GCVG.L.
USDV.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GCVG.L is Convertible Bonds. USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while GCVG.L tracks Refinitiv Qualified Global Convertible (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USDV.L and 0.55% for GCVG.L.
Find the right allocation for USDV.L and GCVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer