PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USDV.L vs. GCVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GCVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USDV.L achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than GCVG.L's 18.10% return.


USDV.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.22%
YTD
7.22%
6M
6.65%
1Y
14.81%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
9.84%

GCVG.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.45%
YTD
18.10%
6M
19.59%
1Y
36.26%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
7.22%1.15%9.34%-3.52%13.80%
GCVG.L
SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
18.10%22.98%9.45%13.81%-14.46%

Correlation

The correlation between USDV.L and GCVG.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022

0.22

The correlation between USDV.L and GCVG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USDV.L
GCVG.L

Industrials

17.5%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

17.0%
0.6%

Utilities

14.8%
2.4%

Financial Services

11.5%
4.5%

Technology

8.9%
23.8%

Basic Materials

6.4%
4.0%

Healthcare

6.2%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
8.6%

Real Estate

4.6%
1.6%

Energy

4.5%
1.4%

Communication Services

3.5%
1.8%

Industrials

USDV.L
17.5%
GCVG.L
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

USDV.L
17.0%
GCVG.L
0.6%

Utilities

USDV.L
14.8%
GCVG.L
2.4%

Financial Services

USDV.L
11.5%
GCVG.L
4.5%

Technology

USDV.L
8.9%
GCVG.L
23.8%

Basic Materials

USDV.L
6.4%
GCVG.L
4.0%

Healthcare

USDV.L
6.2%
GCVG.L
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

USDV.L
5.2%
GCVG.L
8.6%

Real Estate

USDV.L
4.6%
GCVG.L
1.6%

Energy

USDV.L
4.5%
GCVG.L
1.4%

Communication Services

USDV.L
3.5%
GCVG.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USDV.L vs. GCVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GCVG.L
GCVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GCVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GCVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) and SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GCVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USDV.LGCVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.63

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

5.55

-3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

24.09

-18.67

USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the GCVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USDV.L and GCVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USDV.LGCVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

3.19

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.07

-0.23

Drawdowns

USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USDV.L drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, which is greater than GCVG.L's maximum drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USDV.L and GCVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USDV.LGCVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.80%

-17.60%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-6.51%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-7.62%

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-0.44%

-3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-5.48%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

1.51%

+1.07%

Volatility

USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) is 2.53%, while SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GCVG.L) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that USDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USDV.LGCVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

3.96%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

9.31%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

11.34%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.78%

9.93%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.33%

9.93%

+5.40%

USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USDV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GCVG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

USDV.L vs. GCVG.L - Dividend Comparison

USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than GCVG.L's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCVG.L
SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
0.52%0.59%0.41%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.20%1.99%2.29%2.11%2.12%2.57%2.65%2.19%3.07%1.65%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USDV.L and GCVG.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USDV.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USDV.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GCVG.L.

USDV.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GCVG.L is Convertible Bonds. USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while GCVG.L tracks Refinitiv Qualified Global Convertible (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.35% for USDV.L and 0.55% for GCVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USDV.L and GCVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer