USDG.L vs. UC81.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

USDG.L (L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and UC81.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Corporate Bonds funds - USDG.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD while UC81.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USDG.L returned 2.09%/yr vs 3.17%/yr for UC81.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USDG.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for UC81.L.

Performance

USDG.L vs. UC81.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USDG.L achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly higher than UC81.L's 1.70% return.

USDG.L

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: 3.23%
• 6M: 4.07%
• 1Y: 8.92%
• 3Y*: 4.38%
• 5Y*: 2.09%
• 10Y*: —

UC81.L

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: 1.70%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: 6.49%
• 3Y*: 3.91%
• 5Y*: 3.17%
• 10Y*: 2.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USDG.L vs. UC81.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
USDG.L L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF	3.23%	0.15%	4.74%	2.41%	-3.62%	-26.09%
UC81.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	1.70%	-0.20%	6.43%	0.38%	4.76%	0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between USDG.L and UC81.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021	0.85

The correlation between USDG.L and UC81.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

USDG.L vs. UC81.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USDG.L

USDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
USDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
USDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
USDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
USDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
USDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

UC81.L

UC81.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
UC81.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
UC81.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
UC81.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
UC81.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
UC81.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USDG.L vs. UC81.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USDG.L	UC81.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	0.98	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	1.49	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.17	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	1.34	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.38	3.41	+0.97

USDG.L vs. UC81.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the UC81.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USDG.L and UC81.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USDG.L vs. UC81.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USDG.L drawdown since its inception was -32.44%, smaller than the maximum UC81.L drawdown of -36.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USDG.L and UC81.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	USDG.L	UC81.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.44%	-36.65%	+4.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.53%	-4.29%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.61%	-8.01%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.81%	-14.31%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.14%	-1.39%	-19.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.95%	-13.89%	-13.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	1.68%	+0.32%

Volatility

USDG.L vs. UC81.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) at 1.49%. This indicates that USDG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC81.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USDG.L	UC81.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.84%	1.49%	+0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.85%	4.33%	+2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.99%	5.90%	+2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.65%	7.78%	+0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.56%	9.04%	+5.52%

USDG.L vs. UC81.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USDG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than UC81.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

USDG.L vs. UC81.L - Dividend Comparison

USDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, less than UC81.L's 4.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UC81.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	4.61%	5.59%	4.76%	3.28%	1.37%	1.58%	2.75%	2.90%	2.20%	2.16%	1.86%	0.84%
USDG.L L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF	4.56%	4.70%	3.99%	3.26%	2.24%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USDG.L and UC81.L in my portfolio?

USDG.L and UC81.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USDG.L or UC81.L?

On fees, USDG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USDG.L or UC81.L?

USDG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UC81.L.

What is the main difference between USDG.L and UC81.L?

USDG.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while UC81.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for USDG.L and 0.18% for UC81.L.