USCL.TO vs. HLIF.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO).
USCL.TO and HLIF.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USCL.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jul 5, 2023. HLIF.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022.
Performance
USCL.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USCL.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | -5.43% | 10.03% | 38.54% | 4.33% |
HLIF.TO Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A | 8.54% | 25.43% | 17.21% | 2.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCL.TO achieves a -5.43% return, which is significantly lower than HLIF.TO's 8.54% return.
USCL.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -5.43%
- 6M
- -3.57%
- 1Y
- 8.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HLIF.TO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 16.08%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USCL.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCL.TO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HLIF.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USCL.TO vs. HLIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
USCL.TO
HLIF.TO
USCL.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USCL.TO | HLIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 3.42 | -2.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 4.29 | -3.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.79 | -0.66 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 3.89 | -3.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | 23.88 | -21.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USCL.TO | HLIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 3.42 | -2.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 1.33 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between USCL.TO and HLIF.TO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
USCL.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Dividend Comparison
USCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.76%, more than HLIF.TO's 5.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 13.76% | 12.94% | 11.57% | 7.08% | 0.00% |
HLIF.TO Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A | 5.56% | 6.26% | 7.33% | 7.96% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
USCL.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, which is greater than HLIF.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL.TO and HLIF.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCL.TO | HLIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -11.12% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.94% | -8.48% | -6.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.56% | -0.46% | -8.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -2.10% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 1.38% | +2.25% |
Volatility
USCL.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO) at 3.11%. This indicates that USCL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USCL.TO | HLIF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 3.11% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 5.47% | +4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.04% | 9.54% | +10.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 10.58% | +5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 10.58% | +5.04% |