PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
USCC-U.TO vs. CASH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

USCC-U.TO vs. CASH.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

USCC-U.TO (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USCC-U.TO is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Global X, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USCC-U.TO returned 16.01%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for CASH.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

USCC-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC-U.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USCC-U.TO is traded in USD, while CASH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CASH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCC-U.TO achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's -1.49% return.

USCC-U.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
1.98%
6M
7.58%
YTD
7.58%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
11.82%

CASH.TO

1D
0.70%
1M
-0.46%
6M
-0.17%
YTD
-1.49%
1Y
-0.34%
3Y*
1.15%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCC-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
USCC-U.TO
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF		7.58%14.45%22.34%20.53%-14.60%0.08%
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF		-1.49%7.36%-3.63%7.67%-3.72%-2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between USCC-U.TO and CASH.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021

0.27

The correlation between USCC-U.TO and CASH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF

Global X High Interest Savings ETF

Often compared with CASH.TO:
CASH.TO vs. ZMMK.TOCASH.TO vs. CBIL.TOCASH.TO vs. HSAV.TOCASH.TO vs. PSA.TOCASH.TO vs. CMR.TOCASH.TO vs. SGOVCASH.TO vs. TCSH.TO

Return for Risk

USCC-U.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
USCC-U.TO
USCC-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USCC-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCC-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCC-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
USCC-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCC-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
CASH.TO
CASH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCC-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC-U.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

USCC-U.TOCASH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.87
-0.08

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.56
-0.09

+2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.99

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

-0.08

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

-0.18

+11.09

USCC-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCC-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCC-U.TO and CASH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USCC-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCC-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -9.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCC-U.TO and CASH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

USCC-U.TOCASH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.14%

-9.29%

-31.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-4.44%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.00%

-7.69%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.14%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.14%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-3.09%

+2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-2.82%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.89%

-0.14%

Volatility

USCC-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 1.28%. This indicates that USCC-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

USCC-U.TOCASH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

1.28%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

3.29%

+4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.24%

4.35%

+5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

6.21%

+8.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.43%

6.21%

+18.22%

Dividends

USCC-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison

USCC-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, more than CASH.TO's 2.12% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF		2.12%2.53%4.37%5.05%2.30%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USCC-U.TO
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF		9.66%9.88%10.20%11.22%10.76%5.11%4.95%5.09%6.49%5.36%5.62%6.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

USCC-U.TO and CASH.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USCC-U.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while CASH.TO is Money Market.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCC-U.TO and CASH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer