USCBX vs. FSMUX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

USCBX (USAA California Bond Fund) and FSMUX (Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, USCBX returned 0.92%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for FSMUX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USCBX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for FSMUX.

Performance

USCBX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA California Bond Fund (USCBX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCBX achieves a 2.27% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's 1.47% return.

USCBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 2.27%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 7.78%
• 3Y*: 3.81%
• 5Y*: 0.92%
• 10Y*: 2.12%

FSMUX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.95%
• 1Y: 6.57%
• 3Y*: 3.66%
• 5Y*: 0.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCBX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
USCBX USAA California Bond Fund	2.27%	3.20%	1.91%	6.68%	-9.75%	0.59%
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund	1.47%	3.14%	2.99%	6.78%	-11.25%	0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between USCBX and FSMUX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021	0.78

The correlation between USCBX and FSMUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

USCBX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCBX

USCBX Risk / Return Rank: 69
USCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
USCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
USCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
USCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
USCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FSMUX

FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCBX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA California Bond Fund (USCBX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USCBX	FSMUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.46	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	4.25	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.65	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	2.84	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.90	10.43	-2.53

USCBX vs. FSMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the FSMUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCBX and FSMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USCBX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCBX drawdown since its inception was -17.54%, which is greater than FSMUX's maximum drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCBX and FSMUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCBX	FSMUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.54%	-16.27%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.27%	-2.68%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.96%	-5.95%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.73%	-16.27%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.11%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-5.39%	+3.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	0.71%	+0.28%

Volatility

USCBX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison

USAA California Bond Fund (USCBX) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) at 0.80%. This indicates that USCBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCBX	FSMUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.98%	0.80%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.35%	2.07%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.42%	3.09%	+0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.14%	4.62%	+0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.60%	4.62%	-0.02%

USCBX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCBX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

USCBX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison

USCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than FSMUX's 2.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund	2.99%	3.26%	3.74%	3.18%	2.14%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USCBX USAA California Bond Fund	3.47%	3.96%	3.73%	3.17%	2.85%	2.29%	2.59%	2.74%	3.20%	3.34%	3.49%	3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCBX and FSMUX in my portfolio?

USCBX and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USCBX or FSMUX?

USCBX has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to FSMUX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCBX dropped -17.54% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.