PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCB vs. CIHKY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

USCB vs. CIHKY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. (USCB) and China Merchants Bank Co Ltd (CIHKY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCB achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly higher than CIHKY's -8.24% return.


USCB

1D
-2.86%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
0.11%
1Y
12.60%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
10Y*

CIHKY

1D
-1.62%
1M
1.39%
YTD
-8.24%
6M
-6.67%
1Y
2.41%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
-3.32%
10Y*
16.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCB vs. CIHKY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
USCB
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
-0.82%6.13%47.03%0.41%-12.89%29.44%
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co Ltd
-8.24%39.35%54.40%-33.54%-26.03%-3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between USCB and CIHKY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

USCB:

$332.73M

CIHKY:

$154.05B

EPS

USCB:

$1.45

CIHKY:

$29.47

PE Ratio

USCB:

12.46

CIHKY:

1.03

PEG Ratio

USCB:

0.27

CIHKY:

0.18

PS Ratio

USCB:

2.46

CIHKY:

0.33

PB Ratio

USCB:

1.49

CIHKY:

0.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

USCB:

$140.58M

CIHKY:

$462.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

USCB:

$91.65M

CIHKY:

$323.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

USCB:

$37.81M

CIHKY:

$176.26B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.

China Merchants Bank Co Ltd

Often compared with USCB:
USCB vs. NECBUSCB vs. C
Often compared with CIHKY:
CIHKY vs. OVCHYCIHKY vs. BNP.PA

Return for Risk

USCB vs. CIHKY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCB
USCB Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
USCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
USCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCB Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CIHKY
CIHKY Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CIHKY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIHKY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIHKY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CIHKY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIHKY Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCB vs. CIHKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. (USCB) and China Merchants Bank Co Ltd (CIHKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCBCIHKYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.43

0.11

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

0.32

+0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.04

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

0.15

+0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.87

0.31

+1.57

USCB vs. CIHKY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCB Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the CIHKY Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCB and CIHKY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCBCIHKYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

0.11

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.28

+0.05

Drawdowns

USCB vs. CIHKY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCB drawdown since its inception was -44.24%, smaller than the maximum CIHKY drawdown of -62.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCB and CIHKY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCBCIHKYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.24%

-62.69%

+18.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.61%

-16.33%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-35.96%

+12.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.74%

-17.25%

+5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.39%

-21.82%

+4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.74%

7.80%

-1.06%

Volatility

USCB vs. CIHKY - Volatility Comparison

USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. (USCB) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to China Merchants Bank Co Ltd (CIHKY) at 4.48%. This indicates that USCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIHKY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCBCIHKYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

4.48%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.16%

14.68%

+5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.14%

21.76%

+7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.98%

37.32%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.98%

35.79%

+1.19%

Dividends

USCB vs. CIHKY - Dividend Comparison

USCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than CIHKY's 6.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIHKY
China Merchants Bank Co Ltd
6.97%4.11%5.38%7.03%4.13%2.53%2.26%2.19%3.03%5.12%8.93%3.76%
USCB
USCB Financial Holdings, Inc.
2.50%2.17%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

USCB vs. CIHKY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. and China Merchants Bank Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
26.20M
117.41B
(USCB) Total Revenue
(CIHKY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

USCB vs. CIHKY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. and China Merchants Bank Co Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
96.9%
74.1%
Portfolio components
USCB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.40M and revenue of 26.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.9%.

CIHKY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Merchants Bank Co Ltd reported a gross profit of 86.94B and revenue of 117.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.1%.

USCB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.69M and revenue of 26.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.6%.

CIHKY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Merchants Bank Co Ltd reported an operating income of 44.68B and revenue of 117.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.1%.

USCB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, USCB Financial Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 9.35M and revenue of 26.20M, resulting in a net margin of 35.7%.

CIHKY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Merchants Bank Co Ltd reported a net income of 37.85B and revenue of 117.41B, resulting in a net margin of 32.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


USCB and CIHKY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USCB has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to CIHKY (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCB dropped -44.24% vs CIHKY's -62.69%.

USCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCB and CIHKY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer