PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USBOX vs. YFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USBOX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USBOX achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 28.24% return.


USBOX

1D
0.05%
1M
3.77%
YTD
5.57%
6M
6.69%
1Y
19.82%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
13.78%

YFSIX

1D
2.88%
1M
7.01%
YTD
28.24%
6M
16.51%
1Y
32.67%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USBOX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USBOX
Pear Tree Quality Fund
5.57%15.77%17.99%29.20%-16.25%16.50%18.06%31.18%-1.97%25.67%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
28.24%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between USBOX and YFSIX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between USBOX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USBOX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USBOX
USBOX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
USBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
USBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
USBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
USBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USBOX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USBOXYFSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

1.61

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.32

1.76

+0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

2.43

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.06

7.74

-1.68

USBOX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USBOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USBOX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USBOXYFSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.61

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.60

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.82

-0.36

Drawdowns

USBOX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USBOX drawdown since its inception was -65.67%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USBOX and YFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USBOXYFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.67%

-35.10%

-30.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-14.20%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.41%

-14.20%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.42%

-25.14%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.11%

-4.90%

-12.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

4.47%

-1.20%

Volatility

USBOX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) is 2.76%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that USBOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USBOXYFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

5.80%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

20.78%

-11.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

21.39%

-8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.08%

15.39%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

16.25%

+0.90%

USBOX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USBOX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

USBOX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

USBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.63%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USBOX
Pear Tree Quality Fund
27.63%29.17%8.71%4.37%14.55%0.88%7.47%19.65%15.43%6.92%6.19%12.85%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USBOX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSIX has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to USBOX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USBOX dropped -65.67% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

USBOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USBOX and YFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer