USBOX vs. SVPFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

USBOX (Pear Tree Quality Fund) and SVPFX (Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, USBOX returned 9.08%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for SVPFX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USBOX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for SVPFX.

Performance

USBOX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USBOX achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 1.59% return.

USBOX

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: 3.63%
• 6M: 3.27%
• 1Y: 16.45%
• 3Y*: 15.56%
• 5Y*: 9.08%
• 10Y*: 13.86%

SVPFX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 4.43%
• 3Y*: 4.55%
• 5Y*: 2.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USBOX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
USBOX Pear Tree Quality Fund	3.63%	15.77%	17.99%	29.20%	-16.25%	5.85%
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund	1.59%	4.19%	3.82%	5.30%	-4.37%	0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between USBOX and SVPFX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021	0.14

Over the past year, USBOX and SVPFX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

USBOX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USBOX

USBOX Risk / Return Rank: 24
USBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
USBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
USBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
USBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
USBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

SVPFX

SVPFX Risk / Return Rank: 70
SVPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SVPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SVPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
SVPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SVPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USBOX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USBOX	SVPFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.08	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.92	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.47	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	3.74	-2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.38	12.55	-7.17

USBOX vs. SVPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USBOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the SVPFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USBOX and SVPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USBOX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USBOX drawdown since its inception was -65.67%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USBOX and SVPFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USBOX	SVPFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.67%	-6.37%	-59.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.76%	-1.33%	-11.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.41%	-5.32%	-10.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.42%	-6.37%	-24.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	-0.20%	-1.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.08%	-1.91%	-15.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	0.39%	+2.89%

Volatility

USBOX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison

Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 1.01%. This indicates that USBOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USBOX	SVPFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	1.01%	+2.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.22%	1.71%	+8.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.86%	2.40%	+10.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.14%	5.61%	+10.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.18%	5.50%	+11.68%

USBOX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USBOX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

USBOX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison

USBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.15%, more than SVPFX's 2.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund	2.47%	1.83%	4.37%	4.29%	0.76%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USBOX Pear Tree Quality Fund	28.15%	29.17%	8.71%	4.37%	14.55%	0.88%	7.47%	19.65%	15.43%	6.92%	6.19%	12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USBOX and SVPFX in my portfolio?

USBOX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USBOX or SVPFX?

USBOX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to SVPFX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USBOX dropped -65.67% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SVPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.