PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USBOX vs. NWAUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USBOX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USBOX achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly lower than NWAUX's 7.87% return.


USBOX

1D
0.05%
1M
3.77%
YTD
5.57%
6M
6.69%
1Y
19.82%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
13.78%

NWAUX

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
7.87%
6M
8.12%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USBOX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
USBOX
Pear Tree Quality Fund
5.57%15.77%17.99%29.20%-16.25%11.73%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
7.87%-4.92%27.90%18.30%-3.23%22.65%

Correlation

The correlation between USBOX and NWAUX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021

0.66

The correlation between USBOX and NWAUX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USBOX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USBOX
USBOX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
USBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
USBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
USBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
USBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

NWAUX
NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USBOX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USBOXNWAUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

0.61

+1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.32

0.94

+1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.11

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.09

+0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.06

2.44

+3.62

USBOX vs. NWAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USBOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the NWAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USBOX and NWAUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USBOXNWAUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

0.61

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.66

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.78

-0.31

Drawdowns

USBOX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USBOX drawdown since its inception was -65.67%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USBOX and NWAUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USBOXNWAUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.67%

-21.07%

-44.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-6.70%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.41%

-19.31%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.42%

-21.07%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.58%

+8.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.11%

-6.92%

-10.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

3.01%

+0.26%

Volatility

USBOX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) is 2.76%, while Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that USBOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USBOXNWAUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

3.45%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

7.66%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

10.05%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.08%

16.09%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

15.93%

+1.22%

USBOX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USBOX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

USBOX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison

USBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.63%, more than NWAUX's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
4.77%4.35%13.58%0.40%1.93%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USBOX
Pear Tree Quality Fund
27.63%29.17%8.71%4.37%14.55%0.88%7.47%19.65%15.43%6.92%6.19%12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


USBOX and NWAUX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWAUX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to USBOX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USBOX dropped -65.67% vs NWAUX's -21.07%.

USBOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USBOX and NWAUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer