PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USBOX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USBOX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USBOX achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 11.80% return. Over the past 10 years, USBOX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 13.57%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.71% annualized return.


USBOX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.56%
6M
3.92%
YTD
6.82%
1Y
16.11%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
13.57%

FSKAX

1D
0.35%
1M
0.86%
6M
9.61%
YTD
11.80%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
20.10%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
14.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USBOX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USBOX
Pear Tree Quality Fund
6.82%15.77%17.99%29.20%-16.25%16.50%18.06%31.18%-1.97%28.49%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
11.80%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between USBOX and FSKAX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.92

The correlation between USBOX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USBOX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USBOX
USBOX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
USBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
USBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
USBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
USBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USBOX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USBOXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

2.59

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.15

11.30

-6.15

USBOX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USBOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USBOX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USBOX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USBOX drawdown since its inception was -65.67%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USBOX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USBOXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.67%

-35.01%

-30.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-8.92%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.41%

-19.43%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.42%

-25.39%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.42%

-35.01%

+4.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.25%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.06%

-4.00%

-13.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

2.04%

+1.21%

Volatility

USBOX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) have volatilities of 3.44% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USBOXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

3.58%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

10.22%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

12.93%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

17.52%

-1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

18.44%

-1.31%

USBOX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USBOX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

USBOX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

USBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.31%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%
USBOX
Pear Tree Quality Fund
27.31%29.17%8.71%4.37%14.55%0.88%7.47%19.65%15.43%6.92%6.19%12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


USBOX and FSKAX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSKAX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to USBOX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USBOX dropped -65.67% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USBOX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer