USBOX vs. FEQHX
USBOX (Pear Tree Quality Fund) and FEQHX (Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, USBOX returned 16.77%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for FEQHX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USBOX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FEQHX.
Performance
USBOX vs. FEQHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USBOX achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly lower than FEQHX's 10.01% return.
USBOX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 5.57%
- 6M
- 6.69%
- 1Y
- 19.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.78%
FEQHX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USBOX vs. FEQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USBOX Pear Tree Quality Fund | 5.57% | 15.77% | 17.99% | 29.20% | 0.35% |
FEQHX Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund | 10.01% | 13.61% | 19.46% | 17.65% | -4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between USBOX and FEQHX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between USBOX and FEQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USBOX vs. FEQHX — Risk / Return Rank
USBOX
FEQHX
USBOX vs. FEQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USBOX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 2.56 | -0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 3.60 | -1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.46 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 3.13 | -1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | 12.53 | -6.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USBOX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.56 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.32 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
USBOX vs. FEQHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USBOX drawdown since its inception was -65.67%, which is greater than FEQHX's maximum drawdown of -10.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USBOX and FEQHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USBOX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.67% | -10.42% | -55.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -7.40% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.41% | -10.42% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.11% | -2.22% | -14.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 1.85% | +1.42% |
Volatility
USBOX vs. FEQHX - Volatility Comparison
Pear Tree Quality Fund (USBOX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) have volatilities of 2.76% and 2.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USBOX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 2.67% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 6.64% | +3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.54% | 9.16% | +3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 11.24% | +4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 11.24% | +5.91% |
USBOX vs. FEQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USBOX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FEQHX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
USBOX vs. FEQHX - Dividend Comparison
USBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.63%, more than FEQHX's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEQHX Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund | 0.51% | 0.43% | 0.61% | 0.77% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USBOX Pear Tree Quality Fund | 27.63% | 29.17% | 8.71% | 4.37% | 14.55% | 0.88% | 7.47% | 19.65% | 15.43% | 6.92% | 6.19% | 12.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USBOX and FEQHX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USBOX has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to FEQHX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USBOX dropped -65.67% vs FEQHX's -10.42%.
FEQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USBOX and FEQHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer