USAI vs. RNWZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

USAI (Pacer American Energy Independence ETF) and RNWZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. USAI is passively managed, while RNWZ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USAI returned 26.68%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for RNWZ. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

USAI vs. RNWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAI achieves a 23.98% return, which is significantly higher than RNWZ's 16.09% return.

USAI

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 23.98%
• 6M: 21.70%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: 26.68%
• 5Y*: 18.67%
• 10Y*: —

RNWZ

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: 16.09%
• 6M: 17.14%
• 1Y: 37.91%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAI vs. RNWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF	23.98%	0.69%	43.99%	14.21%	0.88%
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF	16.09%	36.33%	-7.36%	-3.89%	-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between USAI and RNWZ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022	0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between USAI and RNWZ has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

USAI vs. RNWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USAI	RNWZ
Energy	97.8%	3.8%
Utilities	2.1%	41.0%
Basic Materials	-	4.5%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	6.9%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	5.3%
Real Estate	-	3.2%
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

USAI vs. RNWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAI

USAI Risk / Return Rank: 41
USAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
USAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
USAI Omega Ratio Rank: 38
USAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
USAI Martin Ratio Rank: 37

RNWZ

RNWZ Risk / Return Rank: 81
RNWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
RNWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
RNWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
RNWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RNWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAI vs. RNWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) and TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USAI	RNWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.53	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	3.38	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.45	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	6.29	-3.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.62	15.38	-9.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USAI vs. RNWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the RNWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAI and RNWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USAI	RNWZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	2.53	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.61	-0.10

Drawdowns

USAI vs. RNWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAI drawdown since its inception was -65.25%, which is greater than RNWZ's maximum drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAI and RNWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	USAI	RNWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.25%	-24.90%	-40.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-6.06%	-2.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.22%	-24.74%	+6.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.60%	-4.62%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.36%	-7.18%	-2.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	2.47%	+1.52%

Volatility

USAI vs. RNWZ - Volatility Comparison

Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) at 4.92%. This indicates that USAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USAI	RNWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.69%	4.92%	+1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.27%	11.86%	+0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.81%	15.06%	+0.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.56%	16.98%	+3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.31%	16.98%	+10.33%

USAI vs. RNWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both USAI and RNWZ have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

USAI vs. RNWZ - Dividend Comparison

USAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than RNWZ's 1.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF	1.93%	2.12%	2.36%	3.87%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF	4.13%	5.03%	3.62%	4.99%	5.41%	6.15%	7.67%	6.50%	5.56%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USAI and RNWZ in my portfolio?

USAI and RNWZ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USAI or RNWZ?

USAI has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to RNWZ (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAI dropped -65.25% vs RNWZ's -24.90%.

Which ETF is better, USAI or RNWZ?

On 3-year performance, USAI leads with 26.68% vs 12.77% for RNWZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, RNWZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USAI or RNWZ?

Over the 3-year period, USAI has performed better with a 26.68% return vs 12.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USAI or RNWZ?

USAI and RNWZ have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USAI or RNWZ?

USAI has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 1.93% for RNWZ.

What is the main difference between USAI and RNWZ?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and TrueShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RNWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.