PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USA vs. RITM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

USA vs. RITM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liberty All-Star Equity Fund (USA) and Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USA achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly higher than RITM's -12.31% return. Over the past 10 years, USA has outperformed RITM with an annualized return of 12.13%, while RITM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.00% annualized return.


USA

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-3.46%
6M
-1.58%
1Y
-4.32%
3Y*
7.82%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*
12.13%

RITM

1D
0.76%
1M
1.97%
YTD
-12.31%
6M
-11.98%
1Y
-9.45%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
7.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USA vs. RITM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USA
Liberty All-Star Equity Fund
-3.46%0.09%20.81%23.17%-25.20%33.76%12.89%39.70%-5.06%34.66%
RITM
Rithm Capital Corp.
-12.31%10.06%11.07%45.60%-14.44%17.07%-34.36%28.46%-10.35%27.83%

Correlation

The correlation between USA and RITM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2013

0.46

The correlation between USA and RITM shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

USA:

$1.73B

RITM:

$5.27B

EPS

USA:

$1.42

RITM:

$1.31

PE Ratio

USA:

4.04

RITM:

7.10

PS Ratio

USA:

4.81

RITM:

0.92

PB Ratio

USA:

0.84

RITM:

0.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

USA:

$355.74M

RITM:

$5.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

USA:

$329.90M

RITM:

$4.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

USA:

$305.11M

RITM:

$1.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USA vs. RITM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USA
USA Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
USA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
USA Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
USA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
USA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

RITM
RITM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RITM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RITM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RITM Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RITM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RITM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USA vs. RITM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty All-Star Equity Fund (USA) and Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USARITMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.93

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

-0.39

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

-0.85

+0.09

USA vs. RITM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USA Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is comparable to the RITM Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USA and RITM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USA vs. RITM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USA drawdown since its inception was -69.15%, smaller than the maximum RITM drawdown of -81.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USA and RITM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USARITMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.15%

-81.11%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.28%

-27.31%

+12.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.69%

-27.31%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.05%

-36.61%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.07%

-81.11%

+34.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.65%

-20.77%

+12.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-15.96%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

12.58%

-6.15%

Volatility

USA vs. RITM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Liberty All-Star Equity Fund (USA) is 3.16%, while Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that USA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RITM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USARITMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

7.23%

-4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

19.11%

-8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.64%

22.51%

-8.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.26%

27.49%

-7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.56%

40.17%

-17.61%

Dividends

USA vs. RITM - Dividend Comparison

USA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%, more than RITM's 10.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RITM
Rithm Capital Corp.
10.74%9.17%9.23%9.36%12.24%8.40%5.03%12.41%14.07%11.07%11.70%14.39%
USA
Liberty All-Star Equity Fund
11.85%10.67%10.22%9.56%12.11%9.67%9.13%9.75%12.64%8.89%9.30%9.53%

Financials

USA vs. RITM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liberty All-Star Equity Fund and Rithm Capital Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B202120222023202420252026
119.52M
1.38B
(USA) Total Revenue
(RITM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

USA vs. RITM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Liberty All-Star Equity Fund and Rithm Capital Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
92.6%
68.8%
Portfolio components
USA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty All-Star Equity Fund reported a gross profit of 110.71M and revenue of 119.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.6%.

RITM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rithm Capital Corp. reported a gross profit of 949.57M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.

USA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty All-Star Equity Fund reported an operating income of 49.78M and revenue of 119.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.7%.

RITM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rithm Capital Corp. reported an operating income of 142.52M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.

USA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty All-Star Equity Fund reported a net income of 49.78M and revenue of 119.52M, resulting in a net margin of 41.7%.

RITM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rithm Capital Corp. reported a net income of 109.48M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


USA and RITM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RITM has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to USA (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USA dropped -69.15% vs RITM's -81.11%.

USA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USA and RITM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer