PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URTY vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URTY vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTY achieves a 55.97% return, which is significantly higher than SSO's 19.52% return. Over the past 10 years, URTY has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 6.75%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 23.26% annualized return.


URTY

1D
5.14%
1M
-2.55%
6M
31.22%
YTD
55.97%
1Y
118.59%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
-2.82%
10Y*
6.75%
ALL TIME*
14.07%

SSO

1D
2.91%
1M
2.90%
6M
15.55%
YTD
19.52%
1Y
41.35%
3Y*
33.95%
5Y*
17.79%
10Y*
23.26%
ALL TIME*
15.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$185.74M$192.80M$223.12M
$35.77M$36.50M$68.68M

URTY vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URTY
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
55.97%9.26%7.38%24.43%-62.81%28.47%-7.72%72.37%-39.59%38.85%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
19.52%26.19%43.48%46.65%-38.98%60.57%21.54%63.45%-14.60%44.35%

Correlation

The correlation between URTY and SSO is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.84

The correlation between URTY and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

URTY vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
URTY
SSO

Healthcare

20.2%
6.3%

Financial Services

17.7%
25.4%

Technology

14.8%
26.3%

Industrials

14.1%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
6.1%

Real Estate

6.7%
1.3%

Energy

5.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.3%

Utilities

2.7%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.2%

Communication Services

2.2%
6.4%

Healthcare

URTY
20.2%
SSO
6.3%

Financial Services

URTY
17.7%
SSO
25.4%

Technology

URTY
14.8%
SSO
26.3%

Industrials

URTY
14.1%
SSO
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

URTY
9.2%
SSO
6.1%

Real Estate

URTY
6.7%
SSO
1.3%

Energy

URTY
5.4%
SSO
2.3%

Basic Materials

URTY
4.4%
SSO
1.3%

Utilities

URTY
2.7%
SSO
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

URTY
2.6%
SSO
3.2%

Communication Services

URTY
2.2%
SSO
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URTY vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

URTY
URTY Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
URTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
URTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

URTY vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URTYSSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

2.29

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.00

9.14

+2.86

URTY vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTY and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URTY vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTY drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, roughly equal to the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTY and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URTYSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.09%

-84.67%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.56%

-18.17%

-14.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.85%

-35.21%

-30.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.76%

-46.73%

-36.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

-59.34%

-28.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.79%

-1.28%

-34.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-19.44%

-15.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.92%

4.53%

+5.39%

Volatility

URTY vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 7.63%. This indicates that URTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URTYSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.57%

7.63%

+4.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.24%

20.31%

+21.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.90%

25.58%

+32.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.36%

33.91%

+33.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.28%

35.93%

+33.35%

URTY vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

URTY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

URTY vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

URTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than SSO's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.66%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%
URTY
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
0.76%1.02%1.16%0.55%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.28%0.00%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


URTY and SSO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URTY has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to SSO (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTY dropped -88.09% vs SSO's -84.67%.

On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 23.26% vs 6.75% for URTY. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 7.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 23.26% return vs 6.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URTY.

URTY has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.66% for SSO.

URTY tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URTY and 0.87% for SSO.

URTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URTY and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer