URTY vs. BEG
URTY (ProShares UltraPro Russell2000) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. URTY is passively managed, while BEG is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. URTY charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.
Performance
URTY vs. BEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URTY achieves a 56.97% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 658.88% return.
URTY
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- 9.67%
- YTD
- 56.97%
- 6M
- 45.90%
- 1Y
- 125.23%
- 3Y*
- 31.82%
- 5Y*
- -6.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
BEG
- 1D
- -13.66%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 658.88%
- 6M
- 577.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URTY vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | 56.97% | -6.29% |
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 658.88% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between URTY and BEG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URTY vs. BEG — Risk / Return Rank
URTY
BEG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
URTY vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URTY | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.67 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URTY vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URTY drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than BEG's maximum drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTY and BEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URTY | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.09% | -59.85% | -28.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.38% | -13.66% | -21.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -16.74% | -18.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.92% | — | — |
Volatility
URTY vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URTY | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.97% | 212.91% | -153.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.67% | 212.91% | -145.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.41% | 212.91% | -143.50% |
URTY vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
URTY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
URTY vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison
URTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while BEG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | 0.60% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 0.55% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URTY and BEG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URTY.
URTY has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for BEG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URTY and 0.75% for BEG.
Find the right allocation for URTY and BEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer