URTRX vs. SWQRX
URTRX (USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund) and SWQRX (Schwab Target 2065 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, URTRX returned 6.38%/yr vs 9.40%/yr for SWQRX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. URTRX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SWQRX.
Performance
URTRX vs. SWQRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URTRX achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than SWQRX's 11.57% return.
URTRX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- 17.25%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
SWQRX
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 12.21%
- 1Y
- 27.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- —
URTRX vs. SWQRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 7.71% | 14.78% | 8.09% | 13.98% | -13.23% | 10.45% |
SWQRX Schwab Target 2065 Fund | 11.57% | 20.95% | 14.36% | 21.21% | -20.23% | 15.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between URTRX and SWQRX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between URTRX and SWQRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URTRX vs. SWQRX — Risk / Return Rank
URTRX
SWQRX
URTRX vs. SWQRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) and Schwab Target 2065 Fund (SWQRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URTRX | SWQRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.41 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 2.83 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.39 | 12.54 | +1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URTRX | SWQRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.24 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.59 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.70 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
URTRX vs. SWQRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URTRX drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, which is greater than SWQRX's maximum drawdown of -28.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTRX and SWQRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URTRX | SWQRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.10% | -28.26% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | -9.80% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.12% | -16.02% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.52% | -28.26% | +8.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.69% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -6.66% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 2.20% | -0.98% |
Volatility
URTRX vs. SWQRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) is 2.54%, while Schwab Target 2065 Fund (SWQRX) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that URTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWQRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URTRX | SWQRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 3.70% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.82% | 9.79% | -3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.16% | 12.37% | -5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.69% | 15.94% | -6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.35% | 15.79% | -5.44% |
URTRX vs. SWQRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
URTRX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SWQRX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
URTRX vs. SWQRX - Dividend Comparison
URTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, more than SWQRX's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWQRX Schwab Target 2065 Fund | 2.83% | 3.16% | 2.92% | 3.31% | 5.00% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 6.29% | 6.78% | 3.16% | 4.24% | 9.53% | 7.66% | 4.53% | 11.43% | 8.54% | 8.10% | 4.06% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, URTRX and SWQRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SWQRX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to URTRX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTRX dropped -34.10% vs SWQRX's -28.26%.
URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URTRX and SWQRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer