PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URTRX vs. ITDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URTRX vs. ITDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTRX achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than ITDC's 8.17% return.


URTRX

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.22%
YTD
7.71%
6M
8.17%
1Y
17.25%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
7.96%

ITDC

1D
0.30%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.17%
6M
8.61%
1Y
19.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URTRX vs. ITDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
7.71%14.78%8.09%9.89%
ITDC
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF
8.17%16.10%11.41%12.40%

Correlation

The correlation between URTRX and ITDC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023

0.95

The correlation between URTRX and ITDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URTRX vs. ITDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTRX
URTRX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
URTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
URTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ITDC
ITDC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ITDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTRX vs. ITDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URTRXITDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.95

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.39

13.11

+1.29

URTRX vs. ITDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the ITDC Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTRX and ITDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URTRXITDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.28

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

1.89

-1.28

Drawdowns

URTRX vs. ITDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTRX drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, which is greater than ITDC's maximum drawdown of -10.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTRX and ITDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URTRXITDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.10%

-10.39%

-23.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-6.63%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.21%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-1.08%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.49%

-0.27%

Volatility

URTRX vs. ITDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) is 2.54%, while Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that URTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URTRXITDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

2.77%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

6.92%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.16%

8.59%

-1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.69%

10.04%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.35%

10.04%

+0.31%

URTRX vs. ITDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

URTRX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ITDC's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

URTRX vs. ITDC - Dividend Comparison

URTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, more than ITDC's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITDC
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF
1.87%2.02%1.93%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.29%6.78%3.16%4.24%9.53%7.66%4.53%11.43%8.54%8.10%4.06%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, URTRX and ITDC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITDC has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to URTRX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTRX dropped -34.10% vs ITDC's -10.39%.

URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URTRX and ITDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer