PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URTRX vs. ITDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URTRX vs. ITDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with URTRX having a 7.33% return and ITDC slightly lower at 7.27%.


URTRX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.07%
YTD
7.33%
6M
6.77%
1Y
15.77%
3Y*
12.69%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
8.17%

ITDC

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
7.27%
6M
6.49%
1Y
17.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URTRX vs. ITDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
7.33%14.78%8.09%9.30%
ITDC
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF
7.27%16.10%11.41%12.40%

Correlation

The correlation between URTRX and ITDC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.95

The correlation between URTRX and ITDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URTRX vs. ITDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTRX
URTRX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
URTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
URTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ITDC
ITDC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ITDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTRX vs. ITDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URTRXITDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.59

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.55

11.28

+1.27

URTRX vs. ITDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the ITDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTRX and ITDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URTRX vs. ITDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTRX drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, which is greater than ITDC's maximum drawdown of -10.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTRX and ITDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URTRXITDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.10%

-10.39%

-23.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-6.63%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-1.03%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-1.08%

-3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.52%

-0.27%

Volatility

URTRX vs. ITDC - Volatility Comparison

USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URTRXITDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.42%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.48%

7.53%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.69%

9.00%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.76%

10.13%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.33%

10.13%

+0.20%

URTRX vs. ITDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

URTRX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ITDC's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

URTRX vs. ITDC - Dividend Comparison

URTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than ITDC's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITDC
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF
1.89%2.02%1.93%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.32%6.78%3.16%4.24%9.53%7.66%4.53%11.43%8.54%8.10%4.06%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, URTRX and ITDC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITDC has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to URTRX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTRX dropped -34.10% vs ITDC's -10.39%.

URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URTRX and ITDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer