URTH vs. IWVL.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L).

URTH and IWVL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URTH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. IWVL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. It was launched on Oct 3, 2014. Both URTH and IWVL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

URTH vs. IWVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

URTH vs. IWVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF	-2.13%	21.36%	18.66%	23.95%	-17.97%	22.27%	15.78%	28.15%	-8.56%	22.95%
IWVL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	6.21%	40.41%	5.13%	19.53%	-9.79%	20.11%	-3.67%	18.13%	-14.03%	22.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTH achieves a -2.13% return, which is significantly lower than IWVL.L's 6.21% return. Over the past 10 years, URTH has outperformed IWVL.L with an annualized return of 12.17%, while IWVL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.75% annualized return.

URTH

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -4.40%
• YTD: -2.13%
• 6M: 0.51%
• 1Y: 20.24%
• 3Y*: 17.49%
• 5Y*: 10.46%
• 10Y*: 12.17%

IWVL.L

• 1D: 4.26%
• 1M: -2.72%
• YTD: 6.21%
• 6M: 16.29%
• 1Y: 39.09%
• 3Y*: 21.08%
• 5Y*: 12.18%
• 10Y*: 10.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URTH vs. IWVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

URTH has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than IWVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

IWVL.L

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

URTH

iShares MSCI World ETF

Return for Risk

URTH vs. IWVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTH

URTH Risk / Return Rank: 68
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 69
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 76

IWVL.L

IWVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IWVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
IWVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
IWVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IWVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTH vs. IWVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URTH	IWVL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	2.34	-1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	3.03	-1.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.45	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	4.11	-2.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.34	15.80	-7.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URTH vs. IWVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTH and IWVL.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URTH	IWVL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	2.34	-1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.77	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.64	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.50	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between URTH and IWVL.L is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

URTH vs. IWVL.L - Dividend Comparison

URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while IWVL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF	1.52%	1.48%	1.47%	1.70%	1.68%	1.50%	1.52%	2.16%	2.30%	1.88%	2.15%	2.35%
IWVL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

URTH vs. IWVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTH drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum IWVL.L drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTH and IWVL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	URTH	IWVL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.01%	-39.30%	+5.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.85%	-12.04%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.05%	-26.55%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.01%	-39.30%	+5.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.49%	-4.85%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-7.60%	+3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	2.47%	0.00%

Volatility

URTH vs. IWVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) is 5.68%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that URTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URTH	IWVL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.68%	7.37%	-1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.53%	11.16%	-1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.36%	16.65%	+0.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.16%	15.71%	+0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.27%	16.86%	+0.41%