URSBX vs. DBLSX
URSBX (Victory Short-Term Bond Fund Class R6) and DBLSX (DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, URSBX returned 3.30%/yr vs 3.21%/yr for DBLSX. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. URSBX charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBLSX.
Performance
URSBX vs. DBLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URSBX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than DBLSX's 1.45% return.
URSBX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 3.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.36%
DBLSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- 2.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
URSBX vs. DBLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URSBX Victory Short-Term Bond Fund Class R6 | 1.27% | 6.15% | 6.48% | 5.91% | -2.74% | 1.11% | 4.99% | 5.07% | 1.77% | 2.53% |
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund | 1.45% | 5.74% | 5.32% | 6.76% | -2.69% | 0.70% | 2.02% | 4.73% | 1.40% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between URSBX and DBLSX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.53 |
The correlation between URSBX and DBLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URSBX vs. DBLSX — Risk / Return Rank
URSBX
DBLSX
URSBX vs. DBLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Short-Term Bond Fund Class R6 (URSBX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URSBX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.83 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 5.33 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.17 | 24.20 | -9.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URSBX vs. DBLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URSBX drawdown since its inception was -5.57%, smaller than the maximum DBLSX drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URSBX and DBLSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URSBX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -57.22% | +51.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.19% | -0.72% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.19% | -0.72% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.94% | -4.71% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -44.79% | +44.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -31.65% | +31.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 0.16% | +0.12% |
Volatility
URSBX vs. DBLSX - Volatility Comparison
Victory Short-Term Bond Fund Class R6 (URSBX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) have volatilities of 0.32% and 0.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URSBX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.32% | 0.33% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.45% | 0.95% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95% | 1.22% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.09% | 1.41% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.88% | 63.98% | -62.10% |
URSBX vs. DBLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
URSBX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than DBLSX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
URSBX vs. DBLSX - Dividend Comparison
URSBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than DBLSX's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund | 4.12% | 4.64% | 5.09% | 4.49% | 2.50% | 1.72% | 2.37% | 3.21% | 2.92% | 2.42% | 2.52% | 2.47% |
URSBX Victory Short-Term Bond Fund Class R6 | 4.38% | 4.74% | 4.57% | 3.31% | 2.61% | 2.86% | 3.53% | 2.96% | 2.85% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URSBX and DBLSX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBLSX has higher volatility (0.33%) compared to URSBX (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URSBX dropped -5.57% vs DBLSX's -57.22%.
DBLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URSBX and DBLSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer