PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URNU.L vs. QDVF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URNU.L vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

URNU.L is traded in USD, while QDVF.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QDVF.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNU.L achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly lower than QDVF.DE's 31.18% return.


URNU.L

1D
-1.01%
1M
-9.43%
YTD
17.09%
6M
7.07%
1Y
62.07%
3Y*
39.46%
5Y*
10Y*

QDVF.DE

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
31.18%
6M
29.20%
1Y
46.37%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
20.31%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNU.L vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
URNU.L
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc
17.09%70.47%1.22%39.91%3.03%
QDVF.DE
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
31.18%9.87%2.96%-0.65%3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between URNU.L and QDVF.DE is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2022

0.18

The correlation between URNU.L and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URNU.L vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNU.L
URNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
URNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
URNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVF.DE
QDVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QDVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNU.L vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URNU.LQDVF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.07

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.50

9.70

-5.21

URNU.L vs. QDVF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the QDVF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNU.L and QDVF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URNU.LQDVF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

2.01

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.31

+0.57

Drawdowns

URNU.L vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNU.L and QDVF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URNU.LQDVF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.62%

-67.04%

+28.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.08%

-15.05%

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.62%

-21.81%

-16.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.85%

-7.72%

-9.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.93%

-14.15%

+3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.72%

4.77%

+8.95%

Volatility

URNU.L vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) has a higher volatility of 14.95% compared to iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) at 7.38%. This indicates that URNU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URNU.LQDVF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.95%

7.38%

+7.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.44%

19.70%

+15.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.25%

22.99%

+27.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.61%

26.91%

+13.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.61%

28.77%

+11.84%

URNU.L vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNU.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

URNU.L vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither URNU.L nor QDVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


URNU.L and QDVF.DE have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for URNU.L.

URNU.L is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while QDVF.DE is Energy Equities. URNU.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for URNU.L and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URNU.L and QDVF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer