URNU.L vs. LITU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

URNU.L (Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc) and LITU.L (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds from Global X - URNU.L tracks the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index while LITU.L tracks the Solactive Global Lithium v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, URNU.L returned 39.46%/yr vs 10.21%/yr for LITU.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URNU.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LITU.L.

Performance

URNU.L vs. LITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (LITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNU.L achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly lower than LITU.L's 26.60% return.

URNU.L

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -9.43%
• YTD: 17.09%
• 6M: 7.07%
• 1Y: 62.07%
• 3Y*: 39.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LITU.L

• 1D: -3.04%
• 1M: -6.81%
• YTD: 26.60%
• 6M: 33.72%
• 1Y: 122.91%
• 3Y*: 10.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNU.L vs. LITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
URNU.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc	17.09%	70.47%	1.22%	39.91%	3.03%
LITU.L Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc	26.60%	59.30%	-20.01%	-10.77%	-6.46%

Correlation

The correlation between URNU.L and LITU.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2022	0.45

URNU.L vs. LITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	URNU.L	LITU.L
Energy	60.4%	-
Industrials	25.4%	26.0%
Utilities	9.0%	-
Basic Materials	4.3%	55.4%
Technology	0.9%	11.5%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

URNU.L vs. LITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNU.L

URNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
URNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
URNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
URNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
URNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
URNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

LITU.L

LITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
LITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
LITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNU.L vs. LITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (LITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URNU.L	LITU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	3.93	-2.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	4.21	-2.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.56	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	9.96	-8.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.50	29.16	-24.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URNU.L vs. LITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the LITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNU.L and LITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URNU.L	LITU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	3.93	-2.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	-0.02	+0.91

Drawdowns

URNU.L vs. LITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, smaller than the maximum LITU.L drawdown of -62.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNU.L and LITU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	URNU.L	LITU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.62%	-62.97%	+24.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.08%	-12.27%	-20.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.62%	-51.91%	+13.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.85%	-9.67%	-7.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.93%	-35.32%	+24.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.72%	4.20%	+9.52%

Volatility

URNU.L vs. LITU.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) has a higher volatility of 14.95% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (LITU.L) at 10.16%. This indicates that URNU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URNU.L	LITU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.95%	10.16%	+4.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.44%	21.68%	+13.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.25%	31.18%	+19.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.61%	30.43%	+10.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.61%	30.43%	+10.18%

URNU.L vs. LITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNU.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LITU.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

URNU.L vs. LITU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither URNU.L nor LITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URNU.L and LITU.L in my portfolio?

URNU.L and LITU.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, URNU.L or LITU.L?

On fees, LITU.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, URNU.L or LITU.L?

LITU.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for URNU.L.

What is the main difference between URNU.L and LITU.L?

URNU.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index, while LITU.L tracks Solactive Global Lithium v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for URNU.L and 0.60% for LITU.L.