URNQX vs. BLUEX
URNQX (Victory Nasdaq 100 Index Fund R6 Shares) and BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, URNQX returned 15.83%/yr vs -0.08%/yr for BLUEX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. URNQX charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BLUEX.
Performance
URNQX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URNQX achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -6.78% return.
URNQX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- 15.96%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 31.90%
- 3Y*
- 25.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.83%
- 10Y*
- —
BLUEX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- -6.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.12%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
URNQX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNQX Victory Nasdaq 100 Index Fund R6 Shares | 15.96% | 20.65% | 25.60% | 54.68% | -32.63% | 27.00% | 48.52% | 38.99% | -0.37% | 19.28% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | -6.78% | 4.45% | 7.24% | 14.35% | -14.30% | 3.22% | 34.74% | 35.34% | -4.91% | 19.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between URNQX and BLUEX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between URNQX and BLUEX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URNQX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank
URNQX
BLUEX
URNQX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Nasdaq 100 Index Fund R6 Shares (URNQX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URNQX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.91 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | -0.55 | +3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | -1.26 | +11.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URNQX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URNQX drawdown since its inception was -36.87%, smaller than the maximum BLUEX drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNQX and BLUEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URNQX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.87% | -54.27% | +17.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.04% | -12.19% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -12.19% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | -21.87% | -15.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -8.72% | +4.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -13.36% | +6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 5.26% | -2.00% |
Volatility
URNQX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison
Victory Nasdaq 100 Index Fund R6 Shares (URNQX) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 4.01%. This indicates that URNQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URNQX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.08% | 4.01% | +5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.53% | 8.33% | +6.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 10.48% | +7.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.19% | 10.72% | +12.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 16.57% | +6.81% |
URNQX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
URNQX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
URNQX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison
URNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than BLUEX's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 11.84% | 27.20% | 25.43% | 13.71% | 13.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
URNQX Victory Nasdaq 100 Index Fund R6 Shares | 2.70% | 3.13% | 2.31% | 2.72% | 4.32% | 4.59% | 1.64% | 0.92% | 0.80% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URNQX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URNQX has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to BLUEX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URNQX dropped -36.87% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.
URNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URNQX and BLUEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer