URG vs. DML.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Ur-Energy Inc. (URG) and Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO).
Performance
URG vs. DML.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
URG vs. DML.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URG Ur-Energy Inc. | 7.19% | 20.87% | -25.32% | 33.91% | -5.74% | 52.27% | 36.14% | -9.46% | -4.92% | 28.71% |
DML.TO Denison Mines Corp. | 33.71% | 46.15% | 3.61% | 53.09% | -16.88% | 108.67% | 58.67% | -10.00% | -15.79% | 5.38% |
Different Trading Currencies
URG is traded in USD, while DML.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the DML.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
URG:
$563.47M
DML.TO:
CA$4.44B
URG:
-$0.20
DML.TO:
-CA$0.24
URG:
20.27
DML.TO:
902.65
URG:
7.28
DML.TO:
12.07
URG:
$27.21M
DML.TO:
CA$4.92M
URG:
-$17.73M
DML.TO:
-CA$23.94M
URG:
-$70.31M
DML.TO:
-CA$171.25M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URG achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly lower than DML.TO's 33.71% return. Over the past 10 years, URG has underperformed DML.TO with an annualized return of 11.34%, while DML.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.23% annualized return.
URG
- 1D
- 7.97%
- 1M
- -10.78%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- -16.76%
- 1Y
- 121.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
DML.TO
- 1D
- 7.52%
- 1M
- -14.82%
- YTD
- 33.71%
- 6M
- 28.88%
- 1Y
- 171.31%
- 3Y*
- 48.29%
- 5Y*
- 24.62%
- 10Y*
- 20.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URG vs. DML.TO — Risk / Return Rank
URG
DML.TO
URG vs. DML.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ur-Energy Inc. (URG) and Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URG | DML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 2.69 | -1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 3.16 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.37 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 5.57 | -2.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 15.61 | -9.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URG | DML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 2.69 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.39 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.32 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.12 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between URG and DML.TO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
URG vs. DML.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither URG nor DML.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
URG vs. DML.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URG drawdown since its inception was -91.13%, roughly equal to the maximum DML.TO drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URG and DML.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| URG | DML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.13% | -97.88% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.71% | -29.20% | -16.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.30% | -53.05% | -20.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.30% | -73.39% | +0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.43% | -63.92% | +9.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.73% | -73.75% | +7.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.31% | 10.62% | +9.69% |
Volatility
URG vs. DML.TO - Volatility Comparison
Ur-Energy Inc. (URG) has a higher volatility of 24.18% compared to Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO) at 20.21%. This indicates that URG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DML.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| URG | DML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.18% | 20.21% | +3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.83% | 46.21% | +3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.68% | 64.02% | +11.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.49% | 63.15% | +4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.19% | 64.23% | +1.96% |
Financials
URG vs. DML.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ur-Energy Inc. and Denison Mines Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities