PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URAA vs. MVLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URAA vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URAA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 932.29% return.


URAA

1D
-1.33%
1M
-16.02%
YTD
10.16%
6M
-9.50%
1Y
69.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MVLL

1D
9.51%
1M
210.19%
YTD
932.29%
6M
650.49%
1Y
1,188.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URAA vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between URAA and MVLL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025

0.38

URAA vs. MVLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
URAA
MVLL

Energy

63.0%

-

Industrials

17.2%

-

Utilities

16.2%

-

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Technology

0.9%
66.6%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

URAA
63.0%
MVLL

-

Industrials

URAA
17.2%
MVLL

-

Utilities

URAA
16.2%
MVLL

-

Basic Materials

URAA
2.6%
MVLL

-

Technology

URAA
0.9%
MVLL
66.6%

Communication Services

URAA

-

MVLL

-

Consumer Cyclical

URAA

-

MVLL

-

Consumer Defensive

URAA

-

MVLL

-

Financial Services

URAA

-

MVLL

-

Healthcare

URAA

-

MVLL

-

Real Estate

URAA

-

MVLL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URAA vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URAA
URAA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
URAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
URAA Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
URAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
URAA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MVLL
MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URAA vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URAAMVLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.63

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

24.55

-23.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

51.11

-48.54

URAA vs. MVLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URAA Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the MVLL Sharpe Ratio of 9.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URAA and MVLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URAAMVLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

9.04

-8.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

3.62

-3.34

Drawdowns

URAA vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URAA drawdown since its inception was -67.45%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAA and MVLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URAAMVLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.45%

-59.02%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.91%

-48.93%

-0.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.53%

0.00%

-44.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.30%

-22.35%

-4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.19%

23.46%

+3.73%

Volatility

URAA vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) is 28.36%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 60.89%. This indicates that URAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URAAMVLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.36%

60.89%

-32.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.56%

96.34%

-23.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

94.12%

133.35%

-39.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.87%

139.62%

-50.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.87%

139.62%

-50.75%

URAA vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

URAA has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

URAA vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

URAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.24%, while MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
MVLL
GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
URAA
Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares
9.24%9.14%4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


URAA and MVLL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVLL has higher volatility (60.89%) compared to URAA (28.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAA dropped -67.45% vs MVLL's -59.02%.

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1188.23% vs 69.53% for URAA. On fees, URAA is cheaper at 1.28% per year. On volatility, URAA has been the lower-risk option at 28.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1188.23% return vs 69.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

URAA is cheaper with a 1.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

URAA has the higher dividend yield at 9.24%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.

URAA tracks Solactive United States Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETF Select Index (200%), while MVLL tracks Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for URAA and 1.50% for MVLL.

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.04 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URAA and MVLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer