PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URAA vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URAA vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URAA achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -3.02% return.


URAA

1D
-3.50%
1M
-11.18%
YTD
-5.26%
6M
-11.40%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IFED

1D
0.11%
1M
2.53%
YTD
-3.02%
6M
-4.18%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URAA vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
URAA
Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares
-5.26%88.33%-25.73%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
-3.02%15.02%8.35%

Correlation

The correlation between URAA and IFED is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2024

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URAA vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URAA
URAA Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
URAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
URAA Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
URAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
URAA Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URAA vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URAAIFEDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.05

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

0.23

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

0.57

+0.18

URAA vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URAA Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is comparable to the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URAA and IFED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URAA vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URAA drawdown since its inception was -67.45%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAA and IFED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URAAIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.45%

-22.36%

-45.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.83%

-14.65%

-45.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.29%

-5.00%

-47.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.83%

-5.83%

-22.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.40%

5.87%

+23.53%

Volatility

URAA vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) has a higher volatility of 31.84% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 6.74%. This indicates that URAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URAAIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.84%

6.74%

+25.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.47%

13.82%

+60.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.79%

16.87%

+78.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.63%

19.92%

+69.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.63%

19.92%

+69.71%

URAA vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

URAA has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

URAA vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

URAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.74%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


URAA and IFED have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URAA has higher volatility (31.84%) compared to IFED (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAA dropped -67.45% vs IFED's -22.36%.

On 1-year performance, URAA leads with 21.98% vs 3.33% for IFED. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, URAA has performed better with a 21.98% return vs 3.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for URAA.

URAA has the higher dividend yield at 10.74%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.

URAA is categorized as Uranium, while IFED is Leveraged Equities. URAA tracks Solactive United States Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETF Select Index (200%), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for URAA and 0.45% for IFED.

URAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URAA and IFED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer