UQLT.L vs. IDFF.L
UQLT.L (UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and IDFF.L (iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - UQLT.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Advanced Target Select 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while IDFF.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Far East Ex Japan USD Index (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UQLT.L returned 14.42%/yr vs 9.15%/yr for IDFF.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UQLT.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IDFF.L.
Performance
UQLT.L vs. IDFF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UQLT.L is traded in GBp, while IDFF.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDFF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UQLT.L achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than IDFF.L's 24.04% return. Over the past 10 years, UQLT.L has outperformed IDFF.L with an annualized return of 14.42%, while IDFF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.15% annualized return.
UQLT.L
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 14.42%
IDFF.L
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- -11.85%
- 6M
- 14.81%
- YTD
- 24.04%
- 1Y
- 42.57%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
UQLT.L vs. IDFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UQLT.L UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 10.15% | 17.64% | 20.58% | 33.76% | -25.29% | 27.69% | 19.02% | 34.52% | -6.09% | 23.49% |
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 24.04% | 29.55% | 14.11% | -3.61% | -12.49% | -8.34% | 22.21% | 12.81% | -10.15% | 29.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between UQLT.L and IDFF.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2016 | 0.53 |
The correlation between UQLT.L and IDFF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UQLT.L vs. IDFF.L — Risk / Return Rank
UQLT.L
IDFF.L
UQLT.L vs. IDFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (UQLT.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UQLT.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 2.95 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 10.11 | -1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UQLT.L vs. IDFF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UQLT.L drawdown since its inception was -33.41%, smaller than the maximum IDFF.L drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UQLT.L and IDFF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UQLT.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.41% | -51.16% | +17.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -14.35% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.34% | -19.80% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.53% | -32.24% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.41% | -39.79% | +6.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -14.35% | +13.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -12.97% | +7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 4.20% | -1.42% |
Volatility
UQLT.L vs. IDFF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (UQLT.L) is 3.81%, while iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDFF.L) has a volatility of 10.22%. This indicates that UQLT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UQLT.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 10.22% | -6.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 21.04% | -10.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.88% | 23.79% | -9.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 20.68% | -2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 20.13% | -2.64% |
UQLT.L vs. IDFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UQLT.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than IDFF.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
UQLT.L vs. IDFF.L - Dividend Comparison
UQLT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than IDFF.L's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.13% | 1.46% | 1.85% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.39% | 1.13% | 1.67% | 2.04% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 2.29% |
UQLT.L UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 0.22% | 0.54% | 0.30% | 0.78% | 0.81% | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.93% | 1.24% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UQLT.L and IDFF.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UQLT.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UQLT.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDFF.L.
UQLT.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IDFF.L is Asia Pacific Equities. UQLT.L tracks MSCI USA Quality Advanced Target Select 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while IDFF.L tracks MSCI All Country World Far East Ex Japan USD Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for UQLT.L and 0.74% for IDFF.L.
Find the right allocation for UQLT.L and IDFF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer