PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UQLT.L vs. FEXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UQLT.L vs. FEXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (UQLT.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UQLT.L is traded in GBp, while FEXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FEXU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UQLT.L achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than FEXU.L's 13.92% return. Over the past 10 years, UQLT.L has outperformed FEXU.L with an annualized return of 14.42%, while FEXU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.05% annualized return.


UQLT.L

1D
-0.84%
1M
0.58%
6M
8.77%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
23.33%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
14.42%

FEXU.L

1D
-0.16%
1M
-3.53%
6M
9.45%
YTD
13.92%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
15.94%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UQLT.L vs. FEXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UQLT.L
UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
10.15%17.64%20.58%33.76%-25.29%27.69%19.02%34.52%-6.09%23.49%
FEXU.L
First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF
13.92%7.02%18.72%8.93%-1.84%28.02%10.19%21.28%-5.75%11.04%

Correlation

The correlation between UQLT.L and FEXU.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2016

0.66

The correlation between UQLT.L and FEXU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UQLT.L vs. FEXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UQLT.L
UQLT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
UQLT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UQLT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
UQLT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
UQLT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UQLT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FEXU.L
FEXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FEXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FEXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UQLT.L vs. FEXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (UQLT.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UQLT.LFEXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

4.58

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.36

13.54

-5.18

UQLT.L vs. FEXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UQLT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the FEXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UQLT.L and FEXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UQLT.L vs. FEXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UQLT.L drawdown since its inception was -33.41%, roughly equal to the maximum FEXU.L drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UQLT.L and FEXU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UQLT.LFEXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.41%

-32.12%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-4.95%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.34%

-21.55%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.53%

-21.55%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

-32.12%

-1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-4.56%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-4.16%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.68%

+1.10%

Volatility

UQLT.L vs. FEXU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (UQLT.L) is 3.81%, while First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF (FEXU.L) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that UQLT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UQLT.LFEXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

4.44%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

9.77%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

12.81%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

15.78%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

17.19%

+0.30%

UQLT.L vs. FEXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UQLT.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FEXU.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

UQLT.L vs. FEXU.L - Dividend Comparison

UQLT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while FEXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FEXU.L
First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UQLT.L
UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.22%0.54%0.30%0.78%0.81%0.70%0.86%0.93%1.24%1.04%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


UQLT.L and FEXU.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UQLT.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UQLT.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEXU.L.

UQLT.L tracks MSCI USA Quality Advanced Target Select 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while FEXU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for UQLT.L and 0.75% for FEXU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UQLT.L and FEXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer