UPAD.L vs. BYBG.L
UPAD.L (iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist) and BYBG.L (Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD) are both S&P 500 funds - UPAD.L tracks the S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned Sustainability Screened Index while BYBG.L tracks the S&P 500 Buyback NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UPAD.L returned 20.59%/yr vs 18.54%/yr for BYBG.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UPAD.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BYBG.L.
Performance
UPAD.L vs. BYBG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UPAD.L is traded in USD, while BYBG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BYBG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPAD.L achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than BYBG.L's 8.19% return.
UPAD.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BYBG.L
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- 22.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
UPAD.L vs. BYBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPAD.L iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist | 6.78% | 15.19% | 26.23% | 31.08% | -9.48% |
BYBG.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 8.19% | 17.67% | 13.90% | 15.36% | -4.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPAD.L and BYBG.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2022 | 0.70 |
The correlation between UPAD.L and BYBG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UPAD.L vs. BYBG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
Financial Services
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
Communication Services
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
Consumer Cyclical
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
Healthcare
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
Industrials
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
Consumer Defensive
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
Real Estate
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
-
Basic Materials
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
Utilities
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
Energy
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPAD.L vs. BYBG.L — Risk / Return Rank
UPAD.L
BYBG.L
UPAD.L vs. BYBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist (UPAD.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPAD.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 4.26 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | 11.95 | -3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPAD.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.94 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.59 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
UPAD.L vs. BYBG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPAD.L drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum BYBG.L drawdown of -42.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAD.L and BYBG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPAD.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -42.67% | +23.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -5.29% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.94% | -19.07% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | 0.00% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.60% | -5.69% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 1.89% | +0.84% |
Volatility
UPAD.L vs. BYBG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist (UPAD.L) is 3.14%, while Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that UPAD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPAD.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.35% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.76% | 7.95% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 11.62% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 16.55% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 19.02% | -2.66% |
UPAD.L vs. BYBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPAD.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BYBG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UPAD.L vs. BYBG.L - Dividend Comparison
UPAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while BYBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYBG.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPAD.L iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist | 0.80% | 0.82% | 0.88% | 1.01% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPAD.L and BYBG.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UPAD.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UPAD.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BYBG.L.
UPAD.L tracks S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned Sustainability Screened Index, while BYBG.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for UPAD.L and 0.15% for BYBG.L.
Find the right allocation for UPAD.L and BYBG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer