PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPAAX vs. FLDFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPAAX vs. FLDFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund (UPAAX) and Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UPAAX

1D
2.35%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLDFX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.89%
YTD
8.73%
6M
9.16%
1Y
20.90%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
9.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPAAX vs. FLDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UPAAX and FLDFX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPAAX vs. FLDFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPAAX

FLDFX
FLDFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FLDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPAAX vs. FLDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund (UPAAX) and Meeder Balanced Fund (FLDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UPAAX vs. FLDFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UPAAXFLDFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

132.47

0.53

+131.94

Drawdowns

UPAAX vs. FLDFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPAAX drawdown since its inception was -0.25%, smaller than the maximum FLDFX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAAX and FLDFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPAAXFLDFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-36.88%

+36.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-7.97%

+7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

Volatility

UPAAX vs. FLDFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPAAXFLDFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

8.89%

+12.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

11.76%

+9.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

10.60%

+10.98%

UPAAX vs. FLDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPAAX has a 2.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDFX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPAAX vs. FLDFX - Dividend Comparison

UPAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLDFX
Meeder Balanced Fund
3.23%3.50%26.22%1.58%3.76%8.15%0.60%1.43%1.41%6.08%1.11%1.26%
UPAAX
Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPAAX and FLDFX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPAAX and FLDFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer